1. AI-guided discovery and optimization of antimicrobial peptides through species-aware language model

    This article has 4 authors:
    1. Daehun Bae
    2. Minsang Kim
    3. Jiwon Seo
    4. Hojung Nam

    Reviewed by Arcadia Science

    This article has 1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  2. From Likelihood to Fitness: Improving Variant Effect Prediction in Protein and Genome Language Models

    This article has 4 authors:
    1. Charles W. J. Pugh
    2. Paulina G. Nuñez-Valencia
    3. Mafalda Dias
    4. Jonathan Frazer

    Reviewed by Arcadia Science

    This article has 4 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  3. External validation of machine learning models—registered models and adaptive sample splitting

    This article has 8 authors:
    1. Giuseppe Gallitto
    2. Robert Englert
    3. Balint Kincses
    4. Raviteja Kotikalapudi
    5. Jialin Li
    6. Kevin Hoffschlag
    7. Ulrike Bingel
    8. Tamas Spisak

    Reviewed by GigaScience

    This article has 2 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  4. Spatial Integration of Multi-Omics Data using the novel Multi-Omics Imaging Integration Toolset

    This article has 9 authors:
    1. Maximillian Wess
    2. Maria K. Andersen
    3. Elise Midtbust
    4. Juan Carlos Cabellos Guillem
    5. Trond Viset
    6. Øystein Størkersen
    7. Sebastian Krossa
    8. Morten Beck Rye
    9. May-Britt Tessem

    Reviewed by GigaScience

    This article has 2 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  5. Integrative Analysis of Neuroimaging and Microbiome Data Predicts Cognitive Decline in Parkinson’s Disease

    This article has 3 authors:
    1. Büşranur Delice
    2. Özkan Ufuk Nalbantoğlu
    3. Süleyman Yıldırım

    Reviewed by PREreview

    This article has 1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  6. Predicting the effect of CRISPR-Cas9-based epigenome editing

    This article has 7 authors:
    1. Sanjit Singh Batra
    2. Alan Cabrera
    3. Jeffrey P Spence
    4. Jacob Goell
    5. Selvalakshmi S Anand
    6. Isaac B Hilton
    7. Yun S Song
    This article has been curated by 1 group:
    • Curated by eLife

      eLife Assessment

      This study presents an advance in efforts to use histone post-translational modification (PTM) data to model gene expression and to predict epigenetic editing activity. Such models are broadly useful to the research community, especially ones that can model and predict epigenetic editing activity, which is novel; additionally, the authors have nicely integrated datasets across cell types into their model. The work is mostly solid, but it would be strengthened by performing further comparisons to existing methods that predict gene expression from PTM data and from more comprehensive functional validation of model-predicted epigenome editing outcomes beyond dCas9-p300 based perturbations. This work will be of interest to the epigenetics and computational modeling communities.

    Reviewed by eLife

    This article has 11 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  7. Biophysics-based protein language models for protein engineering

    This article has 8 authors:
    1. Sam Gelman
    2. Bryce Johnson
    3. Chase R. Freschlin
    4. Arnav Sharma
    5. Sameer D’Costa
    6. John Peters
    7. Anthony Gitter
    8. Philip A. Romero

    Reviewed by Arcadia Science

    This article has 16 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  8. Unsupervised reference-free inference reveals unrecognized regulated transcriptomic complexity in human single cells

    This article has 7 authors:
    1. Roozbeh Dehghannasiri
    2. George Henderson
    3. Rob Bierman
    4. Tavor Baharav
    5. Kaitlin Chaung
    6. Peter Wang
    7. Julia Salzman
    This article has been curated by 1 group:
    • Curated by eLife

      eLife Assessment

      This study presents a valuable advance for the analysis of gene expression variation at the level of individual cells by introducing a novel reference-free framework that can detect splicing, fusion, editing, immune-receptor diversity and repeated elements in sequencing data. The evidence supporting these claims is solid, with rigorous validation on simulated datasets and extensive analysis of full-length single-cell sequencing data demonstrating improved performance over existing methods. This work will be of particular interest to researchers developing methods for high-resolution transcriptome analysis and to those studying cellular heterogeneity in health and disease.

    Reviewed by eLife, Arcadia Science

    This article has 6 evaluationsAppears in 2 listsLatest version Latest activity
  9. Pathway activation model for personalized prediction of drug synergy

    This article has 18 authors:
    1. Quang Thinh Trac
    2. Yue Huang
    3. Tom Erkers
    4. Päivi Östling
    5. Anna Bohlin
    6. Albin Osterroos
    7. Mattias Vesterlund
    8. Rozbeh Jafari
    9. Ioannis Siavelis
    10. Helena Backvall
    11. Santeri Kiviluoto
    12. Lukas Orre
    13. Mattias Rantalainen
    14. Janne Lehtiö
    15. Soren Lehmann
    16. Olli Kallioniemi
    17. Yudi Pawitan
    18. Trung Nghia Vu
    This article has been curated by 1 group:
    • Curated by eLife

      eLife Assessment

      This valuable study presents a deep learning framework for predicting synergistic drug combinations for cancer treatment in the AstraZeneca-Sanger (AZS) DREAM Challenge dataset. The level of evidence seems solid, although performance on some datasets seems unconvincing and further validation would be required to demonstrate the generalizability of the model and, in turn, its clinical relevance. The reported tool, DIPx, could be of use for personalized drug synergy prediction and exploring the activated pathways related to the effects of drug combinations.

    Reviewed by eLife

    This article has 14 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  10. Drug combination prediction for cancer treatment using disease-specific drug response profiles and single-cell transcriptional signatures

    This article has 5 authors:
    1. Daniel Osorio
    2. Parastoo Shahrouzi
    3. Xavier Tekpli
    4. Vessela N Kristensen
    5. Marieke L Kuijjer
    This article has been curated by 1 group:
    • Curated by eLife

      eLife Assessment

      The study conducted by Hurtado et al. offers important insights and solid evidence regarding the prediction of drug combinations for cancer treatment. By leveraging disease-specific drug response profiles and single-cell transcriptional signatures, this research not only demonstrates a novel and effective approach to identifying potential drug synergies but it also enhances our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of drug response prediction.

    Reviewed by eLife

    This article has 8 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
Previous Page 7 of 127 Next