The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Untangling the cell immune response dynamic for severe and critical cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Antibody response to first and second dose of BNT162b2 in a cohort of characterized healthcare workers
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Limited recovery from post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 at 8 months in a prospective cohort
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Mouthrinses and SARS-CoV-2 viral load in saliva: a living systematic review
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Intranasal HD-Ad vaccine protects the upper and lower respiratory tracts of hACE2 mice against SARS-CoV-2
This article has 20 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Why COVID-19 is not so spread in Africa: How does Ivermectin affect it?
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Interactions between SARS-CoV-2 N-Protein and α-Synuclein Accelerate Amyloid Formation
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Characteristics and impact of Long Covid: Findings from an online survey
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A dynamical map to describe COVID-19 epidemics
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Dry Swab Method of sample collection for SARS-CoV2 testing can be used for culturing virus
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT