Evaluated articles

A list by ScreenIT

Articles that have been evaluated by ScreenIT.

23610 articlesLast updated

Related articles (Labs 🧪)

Showing page 908 of 1181

  1. From predictions to prescriptions: A data-driven response to COVID-19

    1. Dimitris Bertsimas
    2. Leonard Boussioux
    3. Ryan Cory-Wright
    4. Arthur Delarue
    5. Vassilis Digalakis
    6. Alexandre Jacquillat
    7. Driss Lahlou Kitane
    8. Galit Lukin
    9. Michael Li
    10. Luca Mingardi
    11. Omid Nohadani
    12. Agni Orfanoudaki
    13. Theodore Papalexopoulos
    14. Ivan Paskov
    15. Jean Pauphilet
    16. Omar Skali Lami
    17. Bartolomeo Stellato
    18. Hamza Tazi Bouardi
    19. Kimberly Villalobos Carballo
    20. Holly Wiberg
    21. Cynthia Zeng

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  3. Coding-Complete Genome Sequences of 23 SARS-CoV-2 Samples from the Philippines

    1. John Mark Velasco
    2. Piyawan Chinnawirotpisan
    3. Khajohn Joonlasak
    4. Wudtichai Manasatienkij
    5. Angkana Huang
    6. Maria Theresa Valderama
    7. Paula Corazon Diones
    8. Susie Leonardia
    9. Maria Leanor Timbol
    10. Fatima Claire Navarro
    11. Vicente Villa
    12. Henry Tabinas
    13. Domingo Chua
    14. Stefan Fernandez
    15. Anthony Jones
    16. Chonticha Klungthong

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  4. Anosmia in COVID-19 patients

    1. D. Hornuss
    2. B. Lange
    3. N. Schröter
    4. S. Rieg
    5. W.V. Kern
    6. D. Wagner

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    2 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  13. Cohort profile: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 hospitalised patients in Switzerland

    1. Amaury Thiabaud
    2. Anne Iten
    3. Carlo Balmelli
    4. Laurence Senn
    5. Nicolas Troillet
    6. Andreas Widmer
    7. Domenica Flury
    8. Peter W. Schreiber
    9. Miriam Vázquez
    10. Lauro Damonti
    11. Michael Buettcher
    12. Danielle Vuichard-Gysin
    13. Christoph Kuhm
    14. Alexia Cusini
    15. Thomas Riedel
    16. Yvonne Nussbaumer-Ochsner
    17. Roman Gaudenz
    18. Ulrich Heininger
    19. Christoph Berger
    20. Franziska Zucol
    21. Sara Bernhard-Stirnemann
    22. Natascia Corti
    23. Petra Zimmermann
    24. Anita Uka
    25. Anita Niederer-Loher
    26. CĂ©line Gardio
    27. Maroussia Roelens
    28. Olivia Keiser

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  14. Self-sampling of capillary blood for SARS-CoV-2 serology

    1. Lottie Brown
    2. Rachel L. Byrne
    3. Alice Fraser
    4. Sophie I. Owen
    5. Ana I. Cubas-Atienzar
    6. Christopher T. Williams
    7. Grant A. Kay
    8. Luis E. Cuevas
    9. Joseph R. A. Fitchett
    10. Tom Fletcher
    11. Gala Garrod
    12. Konstantina Kontogianni
    13. Sanjeev Krishna
    14. Stefanie Menzies
    15. Tim Planche
    16. Chris Sainter
    17. Henry M. Staines
    18. Lance Turtle
    19. Emily R. Adams

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  17. Field-deployable, rapid diagnostic testing of saliva for SARS-CoV-2

    1. Shan Wei
    2. Hemant Suryawanshi
    3. Alexandre Djandji
    4. Esther Kohl
    5. Stephanie Morgan
    6. Eldad A. Hod
    7. Susan Whittier
    8. Kevin Roth
    9. Raymond Yeh
    10. Juan Carlos Alejaldre
    11. Elaine Fleck
    12. Stephen Ferrara
    13. Daniel Hercz
    14. David Andrews
    15. Lilly Lee
    16. Kristopher A. Hendershot
    17. Joshua Goldstein
    18. Yousin Suh
    19. Mahesh Mansukhani
    20. Zev Williams

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    2 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  18. Sensitivity of ID NOW and RT–PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an ambulatory population

    1. Yuan-Po Tu
    2. Jameel Iqbal
    3. Timothy O'Leary

    • Curated by eLife

      Evaluation Summary:

      The authors evaluate the performance of the Abbott ID NOW SARS-CoV-2 test in a group of non-hospitalized individuals being tested for COVID-19 and compared that performance to an RT-PCR test. The authors also provide an interesting review and meta-analysis of ID NOW performance across the literature. The cohort assessed in this study, however, was small and localized, which currently undermines its comparison with the known performance of the test in broader applications.

      (This preprint has been reviewed by eLife. We include the public reviews from the reviewers here; the authors also receive private feedback with suggested changes to the manuscript. Reviewer #1 agreed to share their name with the authors.)

    Reviewed by eLife, ScreenIT

    5 evaluationsAppears in 2 listsLatest version Latest activity
Next