Showing page 28 of 73 pages of list content

  1. Safety and immunogenicity of PanChol, a single-dose live-attenuated oral cholera vaccine: results from a phase 1a, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

    This article has 22 authors:
    1. Deborah R. Leitner
    2. Stephen R. Walsh
    3. Masataka Suzuki
    4. Michaël Desjardins
    5. Alisse Hannaford
    6. Amy C. Sherman
    7. Hannah Levine
    8. Lena Carr
    9. Elliot Hammerness
    10. Akina Osaki
    11. Emily Sullivan
    12. Bryan Wang
    13. George I. Balazs
    14. Jun Bai Park Chang
    15. Damien M. Slater
    16. Nirajan Puri
    17. Carole J. Kuehl
    18. Wilbur H. Chen
    19. Jason B. Harris
    20. Steven Piantadosi
    21. Lindsey R. Baden
    22. Matthew K. Waldor

    Reviewed by PREreview

    This article has 1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  2. Genetic Diversity of the Malaria Vaccine Candidate PfRIPR in a High Transmission Region of Senegal

    This article has 25 authors:
    1. Megha Nair
    2. Giselle Geering
    3. Alyssa Agarwal
    4. Rebecca Li
    5. Yujie Qiao
    6. Qin Xiao
    7. Mariama N. Pouye
    8. Laty G. Thiam
    9. Aboubacar Ba
    10. Kelly A. Hagadorn
    11. Awa Cisse
    12. Noemi Guerra
    13. Yome Tawaldemedhen
    14. Khadidiatou Mangou
    15. Adam J. Moore
    16. Fatoumata Diallo
    17. Seynabou D. Sene
    18. Bacary D. Sadio
    19. Elizabeth Zhang
    20. Lawrence Shapiro
    21. Saurabh D. Patel
    22. Alassane Mbengue
    23. Ines Vigan-Womas
    24. Zizhang Sheng
    25. Amy K. Bei

    Reviewed by Rapid Reviews Infectious Diseases, PREreview

    This article has 7 evaluationsAppears in 2 listsLatest version Latest activity
  3. Comparing the outputs of intramural and extramural grants funded by National Institutes of Health

    This article has 5 authors:
    1. Xiang Zheng
    2. Qiyao Yang
    3. Jai Potnuri
    4. Chaoqun Ni
    5. B Ian Hutchins
    This article has been curated by 1 group:
    • Curated by eLife

      eLife Assessment

      This important study used five metrics to compare the cost-effectiveness of intramural and extramural research funded by the National Institutes of Health in the United States between 2009 and 2019. They found that each type of research had its own set of strengths: extramural research was more cost-effective in terms of publications, whereas intramural research was more cost-effective in terms of influencing clinical work. The evidence supporting these findings is solid.

    Reviewed by eLife, PREreview

    This article has 10 evaluationsAppears in 2 listsLatest version Latest activity
  4. Flood Risk Profile of Nigeria

    This article has 1 author:
    1. Adeyemi O. Omoge

    Reviewed by PREreview

    This article has 1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity