The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Effect of specific non-pharmaceutical intervention policies on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the counties of the United States
This article has 38 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Immune Memory in Mild COVID-19 Patients and Unexposed Donors Reveals Persistent T Cell Responses After SARS-CoV-2 Infection
This article has 12 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
High prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in care homes affected by COVID-19: Prospective cohort study, England
This article has 28 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless of disease severity
This article has 15 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Analyzing inherent biases in SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serological epidemiologic metrics
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Modeling the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 immunity waning, antigenic drifting, and population serology patterns
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The association between COVID-19-imposed lockdowns and online searches for toothache using Google Trends
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Covid-19 clinical data analysis using Ball Mapper
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID-19 in England: spatial patterns and regional outbreaks
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID-19 virtual patient cohort suggests immune mechanisms driving disease outcomes
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT