Public and Global Health

Cervical cancer screening improvements with self-sampling during the COVID-19 pandemic

1. Miriam Elfström
2. Penelope Grace Gray
3. Joakim Dillner

• Curated by eLife

  eLife assessment

  This paper is of interest to researchers and policy makers involved in cervical cancer prevention. The paper provides insight into how the Covid19 pandemic accelerated changes in organized cervical cancer screening. The claim that self-sampling led to a major improvement of test coverage seems somewhat exaggerated and alternative hypotheses to those provided by the authors on the population who chose self-sampling are possible. Nonetheless, this is a valuable piece of work given the scope of the intervention(s) and the precedent it sets i.e. a crisis can in fact accelerate positive changes in screening that have been academic possibilities rather than practical realities.

Reviewed by eLife

A modelled analysis of the impact of COVID-19-related disruptions to HPV vaccination

1. Louiza S Velentzis
2. Megan A Smith
3. James Killen
4. Julia ML Brotherton
5. Rebecca Guy
6. Karen Canfell

• Curated by eLife

  eLife assessment

  The study presents important findings for public health authorities and policymakers to enable them to make evidence-based decisions when deciding on how to manage the effect of HPV vaccination disruptions. This study is particularly relevant in light of the efforts of the WHO to achieve global elimination of cervical cancers. The findings are convincing and the model used is appropriate.

Reviewed by eLife

Bibliometric Analysis of COVID-19 in the Context of Migration Health: A Study Protocol

1. Sweetmavourneen Pernitez-Agan
2. Mary Ann Bautista
3. Janice Lopez
4. Margaret Sampson
5. Kolitha Wickramage

Reviewed by ScreenIT

Psychological state and family functioning of University of Ibadan students during the COVID-19 lockdown

1. Lucia Yetunde Ojewale

Reviewed by ScreenIT

Genomic epidemiology reveals multiple introductions and spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the Indian state of Karnataka

1. Chitra Pattabiraman
2. Farhat Habib
3. Harsha P. K.
4. Risha Rasheed
5. Pramada Prasad
6. Vijayalakshmi Reddy
7. Prameela Dinesh
8. Tina Damodar
9. Kiran Hosallimath
10. Anson K. George
11. Nakka Vijay Kiran Reddy
12. Banerjee John
13. Amrita Pattanaik
14. Narendra Kumar
15. Reeta S. Mani
16. Manjunatha M. Venkataswamy
17. Shafeeq K. Shahul Hameed
18. Prakash Kumar B. G.
19. Anita Desai
20. Ravi Vasanthapuram

Reviewed by ScreenIT

Adolescents’ health literacy, health protective measures, and health-related quality of life during the Covid-19 pandemic

1. Kirsti Riiser
2. Sølvi Helseth
3. Kristin Haraldstad
4. Astrid Torbjørnsen
5. Kåre Rønn Richardsen

Reviewed by ScreenIT

A case-control and cohort study to determine the relationship between ethnic background and severe COVID-19

1. Rosita Zakeri
2. Rebecca Bendayan
3. Mark Ashworth
4. Daniel M. Bean
5. Hiten Dodhia
6. Stevo Durbaba
7. Kevin O'Gallagher
8. Claire Palmer
9. Vasa Curcin
10. Elizabeth Aitken
11. William Bernal
12. Richard D. Barker
13. Sam Norton
14. Martin Gulliford
15. James T.H. Teo
16. James Galloway
17. Richard J.B. Dobson
18. Ajay M. Shah

Reviewed by ScreenIT

A national cross-sectional survey of public perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic: Self-reported beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors

1. Jeanna Parsons Leigh
2. Kirsten Fiest
3. Rebecca Brundin-Mather
4. Kara Plotnikoff
5. Andrea Soo
6. Emma E. Sypes
7. Liam Whalen-Browne
8. Sofia B. Ahmed
9. Karen E. A. Burns
10. Alison Fox-Robichaud
11. Shelly Kupsch
12. Shelly Longmore
13. Srinivas Murthy
14. Daniel J. Niven
15. Bram Rochwerg
16. Henry T. Stelfox

Reviewed by ScreenIT

WICID framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19

1. Jan M Stratil
2. Maike Voss
3. Laura Arnold

Reviewed by ScreenIT