1. Evidence and characteristics of human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2

    This article has 34 authors:
    1. Min Kang
    2. Jie Wu
    3. Wenjun Ma
    4. Jianfeng He
    5. Jing Lu
    6. Tao Liu
    7. Baisheng Li
    8. Shujiang Mei
    9. Feng Ruan
    10. Lifeng Lin
    11. Lirong Zou
    12. Changwen Ke
    13. Haojie Zhong
    14. Yingtao Zhang
    15. Xuguang Chen
    16. Zhe Liu
    17. Qi Zhu
    18. Jianpeng Xiao
    19. Jianxiang Yu
    20. Jianxiong Hu
    21. Weilin Zeng
    22. Xing Li
    23. Yuhuang Liao
    24. Xiujuan Tang
    25. Songjian Xiao
    26. Ying Wang
    27. Yingchao Song
    28. Xue Zhuang
    29. Lijun Liang
    30. Siqing Zeng
    31. Guanhao He
    32. Peng Lin
    33. Huihong Deng
    34. Tie Song

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    This article has 1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  2. Early epidemiological analysis of the 2019-nCoV outbreak based on a crowdsourced data

    This article has 3 authors:
    1. Kaiyuan Sun
    2. Jenny Chen
    3. Cécile Viboud

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    This article has 1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  3. Real-Time Estimation of the Risk of Death from Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection: Inference Using Exported Cases

    This article has 9 authors:
    1. Sung-mok Jung
    2. Andrei R. Akhmetzhanov
    3. Katsuma Hayashi
    4. Natalie M. Linton
    5. Yichi Yang
    6. Baoyin Yuan
    7. Tetsuro Kobayashi
    8. Ryo Kinoshita
    9. Hiroshi Nishiura

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    This article has 1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  4. Estimated effectiveness of symptom and risk screening to prevent the spread of COVID-19

    This article has 5 authors:
    1. Katelyn Gostic
    2. Ana CR Gomez
    3. Riley O Mummah
    4. Adam J Kucharski
    5. James O Lloyd-Smith

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    This article has 1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  5. The impact of COVID-19 on cancer screening and treatment in older adults: The Multiethnic Cohort Study

    This article has 6 authors:
    1. Victoria P Mak
    2. Kami White
    3. Lynne R Wilkens
    4. Iona Cheng
    5. Christopher A Haiman
    6. Loic Le Marchand
    This article has been curated by 1 group:
    • Curated by eLife

      eLife assessment

      The authors used the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) study to study how COVID-19 impacted access to cancer screenings and treatment. This study's important findings served to identify key factors associated with cancer-related screening and healthcare-seeking during the pandemic. This investigation provides solid evidence to inform future policies, particularly in older and vulnerable populations.

    Reviewed by eLife

    This article has 2 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  6. Associations of four biological age markers with child development: A multi-omic analysis in the European HELIX cohort

    This article has 20 authors:
    1. Oliver Robinson
    2. ChungHo E Lau
    3. Sungyeon Joo
    4. Sandra Andrusaityte
    5. Eva Borras
    6. Paula de Prado-Bert
    7. Lida Chatzi
    8. Hector C Keun
    9. Regina Grazuleviciene
    10. Kristine B Gutzkow
    11. Lea Maitre
    12. Dries S Martens
    13. Eduard Sabido
    14. Valérie Siroux
    15. Jose Urquiza
    16. Marina Vafeiadi
    17. John Wright
    18. Tim S Nawrot
    19. Mariona Bustamante
    20. Martine Vrijheid
    This article has been curated by 1 group:
    • Curated by eLife

      eLife assessment

      This is an important study that examined multiple biological age measures in children, which has been lacking in literature. The findings of this study provided convincing evidence to interpret and understand the aging and developmental processes in children.

    Reviewed by eLife

    This article has 4 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  7. Quantification of impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer screening programmes – a case study from Argentina, Bangladesh, Colombia, Morocco, Sri Lanka, and Thailand

    This article has 11 authors:
    1. Eric Lucas
    2. Raul Murillo
    3. Silvina Arrossi
    4. Martin Bárcena
    5. Youssef Chami
    6. Ashrafun Nessa
    7. Suraj Perera
    8. Padmaka Silva
    9. Suleeporn Sangrajrang
    10. Richard Muwonge
    11. Partha Basu
    This article has been curated by 1 group:
    • Curated by eLife

      eLife assessment

      This study provides important estimates from international cancer screening data repository about the impact of the COVID-pandemic related disruptions on cancer screening programs in selected low- and middle-income countries. The evidence supporting the study is solid and relies on national-level screening program attendee volumes and assessments of screen positives during 2019 (pre-pandemic) and 2020 (during the pandemic). The study provides real-world data estimates of proportions/volumes of missed screenings due to pandemic control measures (lockdowns and closures) and may contribute to future modelling efforts for measuring the impact on late/advanced stage detection and excess case burden and mortality.

    Reviewed by eLife

    This article has 4 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  8. Impact of social isolation on grey matter structure and cognitive functions: A population-based longitudinal neuroimaging study

    This article has 11 authors:
    1. Laurenz Lammer
    2. Frauke Beyer
    3. Melanie Luppa
    4. Christian Sanders
    5. Ronny Baber
    6. Christoph Engel
    7. Kerstin Wirkner
    8. Markus Loffler
    9. Steffi G Riedel-Heller
    10. Arno Villringer
    11. A Veronica Witte
    This article has been curated by 1 group:
    • Curated by eLife

      eLife assessment

      This study provides an important demonstration that loneliness is associated with smaller hippocampal volume, reduced cortical thickness, and worse cognition in healthy older adults. This has theoretical or practical implications beyond a single subfield. The strength of evidence is solid given the cross-sectional and longitudinal design with a few weaknesses. With the analytical and interpretational part strengthened, this paper would be of interest to gerontologists, and dementia/cognitive aging researchers.

    Reviewed by eLife

    This article has 4 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  9. Rapid geographical source attribution of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis genomes using hierarchical machine learning

    This article has 6 authors:
    1. Sion C Bayliss
    2. Rebecca K Locke
    3. Claire Jenkins
    4. Marie Anne Chattaway
    5. Timothy J Dallman
    6. Lauren A Cowley
    This article has been curated by 1 group:
    • Curated by eLife

      eLife assessment

      This important study presents a machine learning-based classifier that can accurately determine the geographic origin of a Salmonella enterica sample from its whole-genome sequencing data in under five minutes leading to actionable public health insights. Applying the method to 2,313 whole genome sequences collected in the United Kingdom and several external validation datasets, the authors provide convincing evidence that Salmonella genomic data can be used to identify the likely geographic source of a food-borne outbreak and, in most cases, correctly identify the country of origin of an infection acquired overseas. The work presents an excellent case for the potential utility of routine genomics coupled with machine learning for public health microbiology and the methods are likely to be applicable to other pathogens besides Salmonella enterica.

    Reviewed by eLife

    This article has 4 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
  10. An umbrella review of systematic reviews on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer prevention and management, and patient needs

    This article has 4 authors:
    1. Taulant Muka
    2. Joshua JX Li
    3. Sahar J Farahani
    4. John PA Ioannidis
    This article has been curated by 1 group:
    • Curated by eLife

      eLife assessment

      This convincing work reviews and synthesizes evidence of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a variety of cancer outcomes. The results have potentially useful implications for various fields of cancer research as they review evidence spanning from cancer prevention efforts to changes in diagnoses and cancer treatment modalities.

    Reviewed by eLife

    This article has 4 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
Previous Page 88 of 464 Next