The Return to the Einstein Spherical Universe Model

  1. Baoliin (Zaitian) Wu

Reviewed by

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

What is the biggest cosmic problem in cosmology? What is the biggest crisis in physics? Based on cosmological coincidences, we discovered and deciphered a Yin-Yang Universe Model that has been circulating for thousands of years, providing visual image evidence for the Einstein Spherical Universe Model that has been silent for a hundred years, and providing simple and elegant explanations for some key scientific problems that have long troubled cosmologists and physicists, such as the asymmetry of matter and antimatter, the cosmic puzzle of cosmic megastructures, making dark matter and dark energy visible, and deciphering the mystery of the Cosmological constant Λ. This discovery makes us believe in the return to the Einstein Spherical Universe Model is the correct option.

Article activity feed

  1. PREreview

    This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a Structured PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/17774954.

    Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint? Yes
    Are the methods well-suited for this research? Somewhat appropriate
    Are the conclusions supported by the data? Somewhat supported
    Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data? Somewhat appropriate and clear
    How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research? Somewhat clearly I believe that the mathematization of the yin-yang principle can enrich physics. Because yin and yang are transforming into each other. The law of energy conservation is preserved. Here, the author should go deeper into the subject. I believe GR mathematics will not be of a big help. Relating Yin-Yang with QED (electromagnetic vacuum quantum) is a promising path.
    Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge? Somewhat likely Yin-Yang philosophy reflects the deep truth of the universe. I believe that modern science could gain a great deal by studying this philosophy in depth and identifying possible applications in contemporary physics.
    Would it benefit from language editing? No
    Would you recommend this preprint to others? Yes, but it needs to be improved
    Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience? Yes, after minor changes NASA measured in 2014 that the universe has Euclidean space. This means the universe is infinite in volume. The models of a finite universe, as of Einstein, are no longer plausible. The author is right that there is no time in the universe. He should go deeper into this subject, as it is of immense importance for the development of cosmology. The equations in this article have no physical meaning. But this is also the case with the Einstein field equations. His gravity tensor unit is not clear yet. We measure gravity with Newtons. Gravity is a force. The weak point of GR is that the geometrization of gravity cannot explain the physical origin of the gravitational force. The author should go deeper into this subject, where space is yin and matter is yang. Maybe this dynamics can give a new model of gravity, which is the leading force of the universe.

    Competing interests

    The author declares that they have no competing interests.

    Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

    The author declares that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.

  2. Version published to 10.20944/preprints202501.2189.v1