Magnetic Affinity-Based Purification of His-Tagged Proteins Using Ni 2+ -Functionalized Nanoparticles
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (Arcadia Science)
Abstract
Recombinant protein purification is essential in many applications across industry, research, and biotechnology. The use of a histidine tag (His6) in affinity chromatography is the gold standard for purification. However, magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) offer an excellent alternative due to their unique properties, such as rapid separation, superparamagnetism, and a high surface-to-volume ratio that facilitates nanoscale functionalization. MNPs provide a more efficient, faster, cost-effective, and sustainable method compared to traditional chromatography. In this work, we report the development and validation of a magnetic nanoparticle-based platform for the efficient, selective, and scalable purification of His6 recombinant proteins. The synthesized Ni 2+ -functionalized MNPs demonstrated high specificity for histidine-tagged proteins, as shown by the selective retention and imidazole-mediated elution of target proteins both from pre-purified samples and complex E. coli lysates. Comparative assays with bovine serum albumin and His6 protein A confirmed the selective affinity of the MNPs for His6. Furthermore, a scaled-up protocol using 4 mL of lysate yielded approximately 0.6 mg/mL of purified protein, doubling the output obtained via conventional immobilized metal affinity chromatography, while preserving purity. The simplicity, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of this method render it a powerful tool for both analytical and preparative-scale protein purification, particularly in low-resource or high-throughput settings.
Article activity feed
-
sophisticated equipment
I don't agree with this statement. You do not need a packed column or a chromatography instrument to perform affinity chromatography; you can just bind to beads in batch and elute. It seems like the major improvement might just be cost effectiveness.
-
cost-effective
It would be super useful to see an outline of this cost versus buying magnetic beads for batch binding. This could include how many times you could reuse the beads with similar efficiency, etc.
-
elute efficiently
Do you think that your beads are truly saturated? If you add more beads, can you recover what is lost in the Pass through? Or is it more of a binding efficiency issue?
-
chromatography
It would be nice to see how the purity of these samples compared to one another.
-
protein
How do you know this? Do you have a way to strip protein off of beads? Or are you just basing this off of estimated total protein concentration recovered?
-
protocol,
Why not compare directly to 6x Ni-NTA magnetic beads? You can do this at very small scale and it would be nice to see the differences in capture efficiency and specificity.
-
with the buffers used
Wouldn't you want to capture 100% of your purified protein? Is this just a matter of how many nanoparticles you add? Do you have a rough idea of the binding capacity of the nanoparticles, or is it pretty variable from one prep to the next?
-
until use.
How long can this powder be stored at 4C? Is it moisture sensitive?
-
