ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
A Novel Method to Reduce ELISA Serial Dilution Assay Workload Applied to SARS-CoV-2 and Seasonal HCoVs
This article has 15 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Accuracy of screening methods of COVID-19 in pregnancy: a cohort study
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Laboratory and field evaluation of the STANDARD Q and Panbio™ SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid test in Namibia using nasopharyngeal samples
This article has 16 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Unusual SARS-CoV-2 intrahost diversity reveals lineage superinfection
This article has 31 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Self-Reported and Physiologic Reactions to Third BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 (Booster) Vaccine Dose
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Detection of COVID-19 in smartphone-based breathing recordings: A pre-screening deep learning tool
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Analysis of the upper respiratory tract microbiota in mild and severe COVID-19 patients
This article has 57 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Access to personal protective equipment in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: results from a nationwide cohort study (UK-REACH)
This article has 41 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Risk factors for low humoral response to BNT-162b2 in hemodialysis patients
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Long-Term Accuracy of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Interferon-γ Release Assay and Its Application in Household Investigation
This article has 13 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT