ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Serum Neutralizing Activity of mRNA-1273 Against the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) Variant: A Preliminary Report
This article has 12 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern subvariants BA.1 and BA.2 in Denmark
This article has 19 authors:Reviewed by Rapid Reviews Infectious Diseases, ScreenIT
-
A Miniaturized Electrostatic Precipitator Respirator Effectively Removes Ambient SARS-CoV-2 Bioaerosols
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Specific CD4+ T Cell Responses to Ancestral SARS-CoV-2 in Children Increase With Age and Show Cross-Reactivity to Beta Variant
This article has 22 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Regional connectivity drove bidirectional transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the Middle East during travel restrictions
This article has 30 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Analysis of Fatality Impact and Seroprevalence Surveys in a Community Sustaining a SARS-CoV-2 Superspreading Event
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
IMPACT OF WEEKNIGHT AND WEEKEND CURFEWS USING MOBILITY DATA: A CASE STUDY OF BENGALURU URBAN
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Accelerated waning of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases
This article has 32 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Endogenous pancreatic microRNAs differentially target the Delta, Omicron, and Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 genomes to upregulate the Diabetes-associated genes
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Mapping SARS-CoV-2 antigenic relationships and serological responses
This article has 32 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT