The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Comparative Analysis of Primer–Probe Sets for RT-qPCR of COVID-19 Causative Virus (SARS-CoV-2)
This article has 18 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Age-Dependent Risks of Incidence and Mortality of COVID-19 in Hubei Province and Other Parts of China
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Epitope-based peptide vaccines predicted against novel coronavirus disease caused by SARS-CoV-2
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors
This article has 31 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Increasing host cellular receptor—angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 expression by coronavirus may facilitate 2019‐nCoV (or SARS‐CoV‐2) infection
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
An effective CTL peptide vaccine for Ebola Zaire Based on Survivors’ CD8+ targeting of a particular nucleocapsid protein epitope with potential implications for COVID-19 vaccine design
This article has 16 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Clinical and radiographic features of cardiac injury in patients with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Clinical Features of COVID-19-Related Liver Functional Abnormality
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Definition and Risks of Cytokine Release Syndrome in 11 Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients With Pneumonia: Analysis of Disease Characteristics
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Spread and control of COVID-19 in China and their associations with population movement, public health emergency measures, and medical resources
This article has 21 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT