The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
The ABO blood group locus and a chromosome 3 gene cluster associate with SARS-CoV-2 respiratory failure in an Italian-Spanish genome-wide association analysis
This article has 131 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
From 5Vs to 6Cs: Operationalizing Epidemic Data Management with COVID-19 Surveillance
This article has 12 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Vitamin D status and seroconversion for COVID-19 in UK healthcare workers
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID-19 immunization threshold(s): an analysis
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID-19: The unreasonable effectiveness of simple models
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Is Nasopharyngeal Swab Comparable With Nasopharyngeal Aspirate to Detect SARS-CoV-2 in Children?
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A pre-registered short-term forecasting study of COVID-19 in Germany and Poland during the second wave
This article has 132 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Estimation of the time-varying reproduction number of COVID-19 outbreak in China
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Epidemiological measures for informing the general public during the SARS-CoV-2-outbreak: simulation study about bias by incomplete case-detection
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 ORF3a structure reveals chloride binding sites
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT