Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 ORF3a structure reveals chloride binding sites

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 ORF3a is believed to form ion channels, which may be involved in the modulation of virus release, and has been implicated in various cellular processes like the up-regulation of fibrinogen expression in lung epithelial cells, downregulation of type 1 interferon receptor, caspase-dependent apoptosis, and increasing IFNAR1 ubiquitination. ORF3a assemblies as homotetramers, which are stabilized by residue C133. A recent cryoEM structure of a homodimeric complex of ORF3a has been released. A lower-resolution cryoEM map of the tetramer suggests two dimers form it, arranged side by side. The dimer’s cryoEM structure revealed that each protomer contains three transmembrane helices arranged in a clockwise configuration forming a six helices transmembrane domain. This domain’s potential permeation pathway has six constrictions narrowing to about 1 Å in radius, suggesting the structure solved is in a closed or inactivated state. At the cytosol end, the permeation pathway encounters a large and polar cavity formed by multiple beta strands from both protomers, which opens to the cytosolic milieu. We modeled the tetramer following the arrangement suggested by the low-resolution tetramer cryoEM map. Molecular dynamics simulations of the tetramer embedded in a membrane and solvated with 0.5 M of KCl were performed. Our simulations show the cytosolic cavity is quickly populated by both K+ and Cl-, yet with different dynamics. K+ ions moved relatively free inside the cavity without forming proper coordination sites. In contrast, Cl- ions enter the cavity, and three of them can become stably coordinated near the intracellular entrance of the potential permeation pathway by an inter-subunit network of positively charged amino acids. Consequently, the central cavity’s electrostatic potential changed from being entirely positive at the beginning of the simulation to more electronegative at the end.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.22.349522: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    The system was equilibrated using the six steps scripts provided by the CHARMM-GUI [17–19] webserver under the AMBER molecular package [20–22].
    AMBER
    suggested: (AMBER, RRID:SCR_016151)
    We used Python 3 [33] and the packages NumPy [34], pandas [35], and matplotlib [36] for data analysis.
    Python
    suggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)
    NumPy
    suggested: (NumPy, RRID:SCR_008633)
    matplotlib
    suggested: (MatPlotLib, RRID:SCR_008624)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.