The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Making the invisible enemy visible
This article has 21 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Modeling the effect of exposure notification and non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission in Washington state
This article has 17 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Linear regression analysis of COVID-19 outbreak and control in Henan province caused by the output population from Wuhan
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Clinically distinct COVID-19 cases share notably similar immune response progression: A follow-up analysis
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Generic probabilistic modelling and non-homogeneity issues for the UK epidemic of COVID-19
This article has 13 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Severe T cell hyporeactivity in ventilated COVID-19 patients correlates with prolonged virus persistence and poor outcomes
This article has 25 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Continuous population-level monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in a large European metropolitan region
This article has 64 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Characteristics of those most vulnerable to employment changes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationally representative cross-sectional study in Wales
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A model to rate strategies for managing disease due to COVID-19 infection
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Characteristics of COVID-19 fatality cases in East Kalimantan, Indonesia
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT