ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Complement activation induces excessive T cell cytotoxicity in severe COVID-19
This article has 58 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Persistence of T Cell and Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Up to 9 Months after Symptom Onset
This article has 16 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Vaccination reduces need for emergency care in breakthrough COVID-19 infections: A multicenter cohort study
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Functional dependence of COVID-19 growth rate on lockdown conditions and rate of vaccination
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The potential of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detection tests in the screening of asymptomatic persons
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Post-Acute COVID Syndrome, the Aftermath of Mild to Severe COVID-19 in Brazilian Patients
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial
This article has 58 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Association between preventive measures against workplace infection and preventive behavior against personal infection
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The ChAdOx1 vectored vaccine, AZD2816, induces strong immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 beta (B.1.351) and other variants of concern in preclinical studies
This article has 26 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
CHA2DS2-VASc score on admission to predict mortality in COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT