CHA2DS2-VASc score on admission to predict mortality in COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Background
CHA2DS2-VASc score is used in non-valvular AF patients to predict thromboembolic risk. Recent studies have tried to evaluate CHA2DS2-VASc score on admission in COVID-19 patients to predict mortality.
Methods
We conducted a literature search on 14 April 2021 to retrieve all published studies, pre-prints and grey literature related to the predictive power of CHA2DS2-VASc score in COVID-19 patients of admission and mortality. Screening of studies and data extraction was done by two authors independently. We used the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool for the methodological quality assessment of the included studies.
Results
Five studies involving 5,941 patients reported the predictive value of CHA2DS2-VASc score for mortality in COVID-19 patients. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE) and area under curve were 0.72 (95% CI 0.63-0.79), 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.81) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.83).
Conclusions
CHA2DS2-VASc score at admission has good predictive value for mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection and can help clinicians identify potentially severe cases early. Early initiation of effective management in these cases may help in reducing overall mortality due to COVID-19.
Trial registry
We prospectively registered this meta-analysis on PROSPERO database (Reg number: CRD42021248398).
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.06.07.21258402: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Selection of studies: We reviewed PubMed, Google scholar, Scirius, Medline, Liliacs, Cochrane, CINAHIL, Plos and SIGLE databases through April 14, 2021. PubMedsuggested: (PubMed, RRID:SCR_004846)Google scholarsuggested: (Google Scholar, RRID:SCR_008878)Medlinesuggested: (MEDLINE, RRID:SCR_002185)All the statistical analyses was completed using software STATA version 13. STATAsuggested: (Stata, RRID:SCR_012763)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are …
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.06.07.21258402: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Selection of studies: We reviewed PubMed, Google scholar, Scirius, Medline, Liliacs, Cochrane, CINAHIL, Plos and SIGLE databases through April 14, 2021. PubMedsuggested: (PubMed, RRID:SCR_004846)Google scholarsuggested: (Google Scholar, RRID:SCR_008878)Medlinesuggested: (MEDLINE, RRID:SCR_002185)All the statistical analyses was completed using software STATA version 13. STATAsuggested: (Stata, RRID:SCR_012763)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-