Generating specific homologous neutralizing-antibodies: a novel therapeutic strategy in cancer treatment
Curation statements for this article:-
Curated by eLife
eLife assessment
This study provides a useful strategy for treating mouse cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mCSCC) with serum derived from mCSCC-exposed mice. The exploration of serum-derived antibodies as a potential therapy for curing cancer is particularly promising but the study provides inadequate evidence for specific effects of mCSCC-binding serum antibodies. This study will be of interest to scientists seeking a novel immunotherapic strategy in cancer therapy.
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (eLife)
- Cancer Biology (eLife)
Abstract
Current cancer therapeutic strategies still face great challenges especially due to tumor relapse, drug resistance, and low treatment efficiency. The reason is that some tumor cells are able to outsmart the host immune mechanisms and evade the immune system. In this study, using the mouse cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mCSCC) as an example, a new cancer immunotherapeutic strategy with homologous neutralizing-antibodies was established. The experiment is divided into three stages. In the first stage, mCSCC cells were isolated and cultured from DMBA/TPA-induced mCSCC. In the second stage, the expanded tumor cells were then injected into healthy mice in order to produce anti-tumor homologous neutralizing-antibodies. In the final stage, therapeutic serum was extracted from healthy mice and injected back into tumor mice. ELISA assay was used to analyze the levels of p53, Bcl-xL, NF-κB, and Bax. The findings demonstrated that the serum treatment reduced tumor volume while also reversing changes in p53, Bcl-xL, NF-κB, and Bax. In conclusion, a novel immunotherapeutic strategy was developed to treat mCSCC, although more study is required to fully understand the mechanism of this serum treatment.
Article activity feed
-
-
-
eLife assessment
This study provides a useful strategy for treating mouse cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mCSCC) with serum derived from mCSCC-exposed mice. The exploration of serum-derived antibodies as a potential therapy for curing cancer is particularly promising but the study provides inadequate evidence for specific effects of mCSCC-binding serum antibodies. This study will be of interest to scientists seeking a novel immunotherapic strategy in cancer therapy.
-
Joint Public Review:
Summary:
This study presents an immunotherapeutic strategy for treating mouse cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mCSCC) using serum from mice inoculated with mCSCC. The author hypothesizes that antibodies in the generated serum could aid the immune system in tumor volume reduction. The study results showed a reduction in tumor volume and altered expression of several cancer markers (p53, Bcl-xL, NF-κB, Bax) suggesting the potential effectiveness of this approach.
Strengths:
The approach shows potential effect on preventing tumor progression, from both the tumor size and the cancer biomarker expression levels bringing attention to the potential role of antibodies and B cell responses in cancer therapy.
Weaknesses:
These are some of the specific things that the author could consider to strengthen the evidence …
Joint Public Review:
Summary:
This study presents an immunotherapeutic strategy for treating mouse cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mCSCC) using serum from mice inoculated with mCSCC. The author hypothesizes that antibodies in the generated serum could aid the immune system in tumor volume reduction. The study results showed a reduction in tumor volume and altered expression of several cancer markers (p53, Bcl-xL, NF-κB, Bax) suggesting the potential effectiveness of this approach.
Strengths:
The approach shows potential effect on preventing tumor progression, from both the tumor size and the cancer biomarker expression levels bringing attention to the potential role of antibodies and B cell responses in cancer therapy.
Weaknesses:
These are some of the specific things that the author could consider to strengthen the evidence supporting the claims in their study.
(1) The study fails to provide evidence of the specific effect of mCSCC-antibodies on mCSCC. The study utilized serum which also contains many immune response factors like cytokines that could contribute to tumor reduction. There is no information on serum centrifugation conditions, which makes it unclear whether immune components like antigen-specific T cells, activated NK cells, or other immune cells were removed from the serum. The study does not provide evidence of neutralizing antibodies through isolation, analysis of B cell responses, or efficacy testing against specific cancer epitopes. To affirm the specific antibodies' role in the observed immune response, isolating antibodies rather than employing whole serum could provide more conclusive evidence. Purifying the serum to isolate mCSCC-binding antibodies, such as through protein A purification, and ELISA would have been more useful to quantify the immune response. It would be interesting to investigate the types of epitopes targeted following direct tumor cell injection. A more thorough characterization of the antibodies, including B cell isolation and/or hybridoma techniques, would strengthen the claim.
(2) In the study design, the control group does not account for the potential immunostimulatory effects of serum injection itself. A better control would be tumor-bearing mice receiving serum from healthy non-mCSCC-exposed mice. Additionally, employing a completely random process for allocating the treatment groups would be preferable. Also, the study does not explain why intravenous injection of tumor cells would produce superior antibodies compared to those naturally generated in mCSCC-bearing mice.
(3) In Figure 2B, it would be more helpful if the author could provide raw data/figures of the tumor than just the bar graph. Similarly in Figure 3, the author should show individual data points in addition to the error bar to visualize the actual distribution.
(4) The author mentioned that different stages of tumor cells have different surface biomarkers. Therefore, experimenting with injecting tumor cells at various stages could reveal the most immunogenic stage. Such an approach would allow for a comparative analysis of immune responses elicited by tumor cells at different stages of development.
(5) In the abstract the author mentioned that using mCSCC is a proof-of-concept for this potential cancer treatment strategy. The discussion session should extend to how this strategy might apply to other cancer types beyond carcinoma.
-
