Exogenous myristate fuels the growth of symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi but disrupts their carbon-phosphorus exchange with host plants

Curation statements for this article:
  • Curated by eLife

    eLife logo

    eLife Assessment

    This study provides important evidence that myristate, a fatty acid commonly present in soil environments, is taken up by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during symbiosis with a plant host. The evidence presented is solid, with multiple experimental approaches including stable isotope tracing, transcriptional analysis, and physiological measurements across different plant species and phosphorus conditions. However, the main claims are only partially supported.

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are obligate biotrophs that rely on host-derived symbiotic carbohydrates. However, it remains unclear whether symbiotic AMF can access exogenous non-symbiotic carbon sources, complicating our understanding of their relationship with host plants. Here, we investigated the direct uptake of exogenous 13C1-labeled myristate by three symbiotic AMF species (Rhizophagus irregularis, R. intraradices, and R. diaphanous) and assessed their growth responses using AMF-carrot hairy root co-culture systems. Furthermore, we explored the environmental distribution of myristate, and evaluated the impact of exogenous myristate on the carbon-phosphorus exchange between R. irregularis and alfalfa or rice in a greenhouse experiment. Symbiotic AMF can absorb exogenous myristate, as evidenced by 13C enrichment and transcriptional activation of fatty acid transport and metabolism genes in AMF extraradical hyphae. Myristate is commonly present in various soil and plant environments, and its application increased both intraradical and extraradical fungal biomass, possibly linked to suppressed mycorrhizal-activated defense responses in host roots. Unexpectedly, exogenous myristate reduced the mycorrhizal phosphorus benefits for both alfalfa and rice and decreased their symbiotic carbon allocation to root-colonizing AMF, although these effects varied with soil phosphorus conditions. These findings provide new insights into understanding and manipulating the nutritional interactions between AMF and host plants.

Article activity feed

  1. eLife Assessment

    This study provides important evidence that myristate, a fatty acid commonly present in soil environments, is taken up by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during symbiosis with a plant host. The evidence presented is solid, with multiple experimental approaches including stable isotope tracing, transcriptional analysis, and physiological measurements across different plant species and phosphorus conditions. However, the main claims are only partially supported.

  2. Reviewer #1 (Public review):

    Summary:

    Two major breakthroughs in the field of arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) were the discoveries that first AM fungi obtain lipids (not only carbohydrates) from their plant hosts (Bravo et al 2017; Jiang et al 2017; Keymer et al 2017; Luginbuehl et al 2017) and second that presumably obligate biotrophic AM fungi can produce spores in the absence of host plants when exposed to myristate (Sugiura et al 2020; Tanaka et al 2022).

    For this manuscript, Chen et al asked the question of whether myristate in the soil may also play a role in AM symbiosis when AM fungi live in symbiosis with their plant hosts. They show that myristate occurs in natural as well as agricultural soils, probably as a component of root exudates. Further, they treat AM fungi with myristate when grown in symbiosis in a Petri dish system with carrot hairy roots or in pots with alfalfa or rice to describe which effect the exogenous myristate has on symbiosis. Using 13C labelling, they show that myristate is taken up by AM fungi, although they can obtain sugars and lipids from the plant host. They also show that myristate leads to an increase in root colonization as well as expression of fungal genes involved in FA assimilation.

    Interestingly, the effect of myristate on colonization depends on the plant species and the level of phosphate fertilization provided to the plant. The reason for this remains unknown.

    Strengths:

    The findings are interesting and provide an advance in our understanding of lipid use by the extraradical mycelium of AM fungi.

    Weaknesses:

    However, there are some misconceptions in the writing, and some experimental results remain poorly clear as they are presented in a highly descriptive manner without interpretation or explanation.

  3. Reviewer #2 (Public review):

    Summary:

    Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are among the most widely distributed soil microorganisms, forming symbiotic relationships (AM symbiosis) with approximately 70% of terrestrial vascular plants. AMF are considered obligate biotrophs that rely on host-derived symbiotic carbohydrates. However, it remains unclear whether symbiotic AMF can access exogenous non-symbiotic carbon sources. By conducting three interconnected and complementary experiments, Chen et al. investigated the direct uptake of exogenous 13C1-labeled myristate by symbiotic Rhizophagus irregularis, R. intraradices, and R. diaphanous, and assessed their growth responses using AMF-carrot hairy root co-culture systems (Experiments 1 and 2). They also explored the environmental distribution of myristate in plant and soil substrates, and evaluated the impact of exogenous myristate on the symbiotic carbon-phosphorus exchange between R. irregularis and alfalfa or rice in a greenhouse experiment (Experiment 3). Given that the AM symbiosis not only plays a significant role in the biogeochemical cycling of C and P elements but also acts as a key driver of plant community structure and productivity. The topic of this manuscript is relevant. The study is well-designed, and the manuscript is well-written. I find it easy and interesting to follow the entire narrative.

    Strengths:

    The manuscript provides evidence from 13C labeling and molecular analyses showing that symbiotic AMF can absorb non-symbiotic C sources like myristate in the presence of plant-derived symbiotic carbohydrates, challenging the traditional assumption that AMF exclusively rely on symbiotic carbon sources supplied from associated host plants. This finding advances our understanding of the nutritional interactions between AMF and host plants. Furthermore, the manuscript reveals that myristate is widely present in diverse soil and plant components; however, exogenous myristate disrupts the carbon-phosphorus exchange in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. These insights have significant implications for the application and regulation of the AM symbiosis in sustainable agriculture and ecological restoration.

    Weaknesses:

    The limitations of this study include:

    (1) The absorption of myristate by symbiotic AMF was observed only after exogenous application under artificial conditions, which may not accurately reflect natural environments.

    (2) The investigation into the mechanism by which myristate disrupts C-P exchange in AM symbiosis remains preliminary.

    Nevertheless, the authors have adequately discussed these limitations in the manuscript.

  4. Reviewer #3 (Public review):

    Summary:

    The authors have addressed a major question since the discovery of myristate uptake from AM fungi as a non-symbiotic C source. Myristate has been used to grow some AM fungi axenically, but the biological significance of this saprobic attitude in natural or agronomical environments remained unexplored. The results of this research soundly demonstrate that myristate-derived C is used by AM fungi, leading to improved development of both extraradical and intraradical mycelium (at least under low P conditions). However, this does not lead to obvious advantages for the plant, since symbiotic nutrient exchange (carbon and phosphorus) is reduced upon myristate application. Furthermore, myristate-treated plants quench their defence responses.

    Strengths:

    The study is extensive, based on a solid experimental setup and methodological approach, combining several state-of-the-art techniques. The conclusions are novel and of high relevance for the scientific community. The writing is fluent and clear.

    Weaknesses:

    Some of the figures should be improved for clarity. The conclusions do not express a conclusive remark that, in my opinion, emerges clearly from the results: myristate application in agriculture does not seem to be a very promising approach, since it unbalances the symbiosis nutritional equilibrium and may weaken plant immunity. This is a very important point (albeit rather unpleasant for applicative scientists) that should be stressed in the conclusions.