Adaptation of endothelial cells to microenvironment topographical cues through lysyl oxidase like-2-mediated basement membrane scaffolding

Curation statements for this article:
  • Curated by eLife

    eLife logo

    eLife Assessment

    This study presents important findings describing the early assembly of vascular basement membrane and how vascular cells switch from responding to cues provided by the external environment to those provided by self-assembled basement membrane. The evidence supporting the claims of the authors is convincing, with state-of-the-art microscopy and several different culture conditions examined. The work will be of interest to cell biologists studying the ECM, vascular development, as well as medical scientists focused on diseases that depend on vascular growth.

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

Basement membrane (BM) provides structural support and signaling platform for blood vessels. While its major structural components are required for vascular morphogenesis, integrating BM regulators, like the lysyl oxidase LOXL2, and BM assembly in cell response to microenvironement cues remain poorly understood. Here we study the early deposition and supramolecular assembly of BM components using correlative atomic force and fluorescence microscopy. The fibrillar deposition of fibronectin is gradually remodeled and associates with the collagen IV meshwork as it organizes into BM. We demonstrate that LOXL2 is deposited with both proteins and participates in their remodeling. Alteration of BM scaffolding by LOXL2-depletion affects focal adhesion maturation and cytoskeleton remodeling. This altered BM organization maintains stress fibers, affects the distribution and activation of mechanosensors and alters cell barrier properties. Furthermore, using 3D micro-printed substrates, we demonstrate that BM assembly regulates endothelial cell response to topographical constraint. We therefore propose a mechanism directly linking the scaffolding of BM components and adaptation to the topographical signals from the microenvironment.

Article activity feed

  1. eLife Assessment

    This study presents important findings describing the early assembly of vascular basement membrane and how vascular cells switch from responding to cues provided by the external environment to those provided by self-assembled basement membrane. The evidence supporting the claims of the authors is convincing, with state-of-the-art microscopy and several different culture conditions examined. The work will be of interest to cell biologists studying the ECM, vascular development, as well as medical scientists focused on diseases that depend on vascular growth.

  2. Reviewer #1 (Public review):

    Summary:

    Marchand et al. seek to understand how basement membrane (BM) is initially assembled around developing vasculature (and by extension basement membrane assembly generally progresses). To do this, they use an established cell culture system that is amenable to advanced microscopy techniques, including high-resolution fluorescence imaging and atomic force microscopy. This allows them to produce very high-quality imaging data that includes both protein localization and matrix topography in 3D. They show that fibronectin (FN) is remodeled as collagen IV (Col IV) assembles. Lysyl oxidase-like-2 (LOXL2) is needed for this process, and without it, BM does not form correctly, cells cannot adhere to BM, and cells also don't correctly form junctions with other cells.

    Detailed Review:

    The authors provide quantitative measures of BM fibril assembly at the earliest timepoints. They show two phases of growth - initial deposition, elongation, and interconnection of short fibers; the second is a significant thickening. As the BM forms, FN is immediately associated with filaments, but laminin and Col IV are not associated with fibers as detected by AFM. LOXL2 is associated with fibers, similar to FN. At a later time point, Col IV becomes associated with fibers, but laminin never does. Likely FN templates LOXL2, which crosslink Col IV into fibrils over time. Could the authors comment on how this data fits with in vivo data from model organisms? Also, I would like to know if they can uncouple LOXL2 from the FN matrix? Could you express a mutated form of LOXL2 that cannot interact with FN but still is able to crosslink Col IV?)

    Depletion of LOXL2 supports this mechanism. Without it, Col IV and FN are uncoupled and accumulate as large aggregates rather than a complex fibrous network. Further, long-term thickening/growth of the fibronectin network is inhibited, indicating LOXL2 and/or the Col IV network positively reinforces fibronectin assembly. (Does LOXL2 directly act on FN, or is this effect dependent on Col IV? The nature of the molecular interactions between COL IV, LOXL2, and FN will be an important future research area.)

    Next, Marchand et al. ask if failure to produce mature BM (induced by LOXL2 depletion) has consequences for underlying cells. They demonstrate a clear shift in the orientation of actin towards a linear alignment, and similarly, cells change shape from round to very elongated. Cell junctions also shifted to a linear arrangement in LOXL2 depletion. This fits with the known balance between cell-ECM and cell-cell adhesion. The changes in actin network and cell shape/adhesion correlate with a change in B1 integrin localization upon LOXL2 depletion. B1 integrin colocalized with sparse early FN fibers, but was absent from large FN aggregates that occur if LOXL2 is depleted. Similar reorganization of integrin adhesion components (FAK, Vinc, Pax). Clearly, there is feedback between BM assembly and cell junction organization. But I think the authors might emphasize to the reader that this normally reinforces the epithelial fate of these cells. It's less a balance and more like a tipping point. (Related to this section, I could not read Figure 4C graphs unless I enlarged them to 300%.)

    Finally, they culture cells on micro groove plates, with or without LOXL2. The grooved substrate can orient the cells, and they show this is superseded by BM once it assembles. Without LOXL2 cells on micro-grooved substrates become disorganized, similar to their observation on flat surfaces (elongated cells, linear actin, etc.). This demonstrates a switch from external topographical cues to self-generated BM. This is consistent with the idea of reorganizing junctions to produce a stable epithelial tube. I was very interested in their 3D culture. The effect of BM assembly on tube diameter makes sense. But how does BM assembly support complex capillary functions like branching? (Can they force branching with targeted mutations that decouple integrin from the BM?) Is this a question of change to cell fate? (Are other remodeling enzymes activated after initial BM assembly that could support growth and/or branching?)

  3. Reviewer #2 (Public review):

    Summary:

    The manuscript entitled "Adaptation of endothelial cells to microenvironment 1 topographical cues through lysyl oxidase like-2-mediated basement membrane scaffolding" by Marchand et al., aims to determine the impact of LOXL2 on the dynamic formation of vascular basement membranes (BMs).

    Strengths:

    This manuscript includes a nice combination of different methods and presents the results in an appropriate manner.

    Furthermore, the results clearly demonstrate an impact of LOXL2 on collagen IV-fibronectin organization and topography. Finally, the proper arrangement of collagen IV-fibronectin impacts cell alignment.

    Weaknesses:

    An open question for this reviewer is what the real take-home message of the present study is? Can the authors deliver novel insight into BM formation transferable to the in vivo situation? Why do the authors not see a "real" BM? Could it be that in vivo endothelial cells do not build the vascular BM alone? Thus, are additional cell types needed? And what will happen then if LOXL2 expression is altered?

    Major comments:

    (1) Can the authors show that LOXL2 cross-links fibronectin and collagen IV?

    (2) The authors stated that LOXL2 depletion affects cytoskeleton arrangements and cell shape. Could it be that this is simply a secondary effect mediated primarily through the altered cross-linking of fibronectin and collagen IV?

    (3) Can the authors perform cell adhesion studies on CDMs derived from wild-type versus LOXL2-deficient cells?

    (4) Line 226-230: Can the authors provide the proliferation data of wildtype and LOXL2-depleted cells supporting their Src and Akt activity findings?

    (5) Line 298-299: The authors made a statement about laminin. Can the authors think of a co-culture of wild-type versus LOXL2-depleted endothelial cells in combination with pericytes or fibroblasts, as these cells contribute to the efficient assembly of a functional vascular basement membrane (10.1182/blood-2009-05-222364). Here, you can determine the impact of altered fibronectin-collagen IV cross-linking on laminin network formation. This will affect their conclusion in lines 299-304, as these facts are solely based on endothelial cells.

    (6) Suggestion: can the authors supplement recombinant LOXL2 protein in its active version to the LOXL2-depleted endothelial cells to rescue the observed changes? And further compare LOXL2 enzymatic function with LOXL2 protein harbouring Zn instead of Cu, making it enzymatic inactive. Here, the authors might be able to strengthen their hypothesis that LOXL2 might bridge fibronectin and collagen IV or link both proteins.

    (7) There are grammatical errors in the manuscript that the authors should work on.

  4. Reviewer #3 (Public review):

    This important study shows that basement membrane (BM) generation is a key event mediating cell 3D organization in response to microenvironmental cues. Such a mechanism participates in the endothelial cell capacity to organize into a capillary vessel segment through the shift of interactions with the interstitial ECM to interactions with vascular BM. This is particularly important for the developing, sprouting vasculature. The authors conclusively show, using TIRF and atomic force microscopy substantiated by 3D sprouting assays, that the lysyl oxidase Loxl2 plays a key role herein. With respect to translation into clinical practice, the dysregulation of adherens junctions and barrier properties associated with Loxl2 dysfunction mediated defects in BM supports its involvement in the progression of long-term microvascular diseases.

    An outstanding question not answered in the current MS is how Loxl2 integrates into the Dll4-Notch mediated control of tip-stalk-phalanx cell differentiation in the developing (embryonic) vasculature. The authors focused a lot on Loxl2 loss of function; however, in a (patho)physiological context, Loxl2 gain of function would be relevant. Loxl2 is a hypoxia target and Loxl2 accumulates in the ECM upon hypoxic stress (as occurs during ischemic CVD, stroke/heart infarct). It would be interesting to know how Loxl2 gain-of-function impacts BM assembly, endothelial behavior, mechanosensing, and vessel angiogenic remodeling.