Endogenous corazonin signaling modulates the post-mating switch in behavior and physiology in females of the brown planthopper and Drosophila

Curation statements for this article:
  • Curated by eLife

    eLife logo

    eLife Assessment

    This important study presents convincing evidence that uncovers a novel signaling axis impacting the post-mating response in females of the brown planthopper. The findings open several avenues for testing the molecular and neurobiological mechanisms of mating behavior in insects, although broad concerns remain about the relevance of some claims.

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

Mating in insects commonly induces an alteration in behavior and physiology in the female that ensures optimal offspring. This is referred to as a post-mating response (PMR). The induction of a PMR requires not only male-derived factors transferred with semen during copulation, such as sex peptide (SP) in Drosophila, but also intrinsic female signaling components. The latter signaling remains poorly understood in most insects, including the brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens, a devastating rice pest. In BPHs the PMR comprises a reduced receptivity to re-mating and increased oviposition. Here, we demonstrate that the neuropeptide corazonin (CRZ) and its receptor (CrzR) are critical for the PMR in female BPHs. Peptide injection and knockdown of CRZ expression by RNAi or CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis demonstrate that distensible CRZ signaling suppresses mating receptivity in virgin N. lugens females and mediates a reduction in re-mating frequency and increased ovulation. The CrzR is highly expressed in the female reproductive tract, and CrzR-knockdown phenocopies Crz diminishment. Importantly, female CRZ/CrzR signaling is indispensable for male seminal fluid factors (e.g. maccessin) to induce the PMR. With disrupted CrzR signaling, seminal fluid or maccessin injection fails to reduce female receptivity. Notably, CRZ is not produced in male accessory gland (MAG) and thus not transferred during copulation. However, male Crz knockout impairs the PMR in mated females and combining male and female Crz knockouts nearly abolished the PMR, demonstrating that CRZ is essential for PMR generation. Transcriptomics of the MAG indicates that Crz knockout affects the expression of numerous seminal fluid protein genes. Finally, we found that also in female Drosophila melanogaster, disrupted Crz signaling resulted in increased re-mating and reduced oviposition, while CRZ injection suppressed virgin receptivity and increased oviposition. In summary, our study reveals that endogenous female CRZ signaling and male-derived signals cooperate to regulate post-mating transitions in BPHs and Drosophila.

Article activity feed

  1. eLife Assessment

    This important study presents convincing evidence that uncovers a novel signaling axis impacting the post-mating response in females of the brown planthopper. The findings open several avenues for testing the molecular and neurobiological mechanisms of mating behavior in insects, although broad concerns remain about the relevance of some claims.

  2. Reviewer #1 (Public review):

    In this work, Zhang et al, through a series of well-designed experiments, present a comprehensive study exploring the roles of the neuropeptide Corazonin (CRZ) and its receptor in controlling the female post-mating response (PMR) in the brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugen and Drosophila melanogaster. Through a series of behavioural assays, micro-injections, gene knockdowns, Crispr/Cas gene editing, and immunostaining, the authors show that both CRZ and CrzR play a vital role in the female post-mating response, with impaired expression of either leading to quicker female remating and reduced ovulation in BPH. Notably, the authors find that this signaling is entirely endogenous in BPH females, with immunostaining of male accessory glands (MAGs) showing no evidence of CRZ expression. Further, the authors demonstrate that while CRZ is not expressed in the MAGs, BPH males with Crz knocked out show transcriptional dysregulation of several seminal fluid proteins and functionally link this dysregulation to an impaired PMR in BPH. In relation, the authors also find that in CrzR mutants, the injection of neither MAG extracts nor maccessin peptide triggered the PMR in BPH females. Finally, the authors extend this study to D. melanogaster, albeit on a more limited scale, and show that CRZ plays a vital role in maintaining PMR in D. melanogaster females with impaired CRZ signaling, once again leading to quicker female remating and reduced ovulation. The authors must be commended for their expansive set of complementary experiments. The manuscript is also generally well written. Given the seemingly conserved nature of CRZ, this work is a significant addition to the literature, opening several avenues for testing the molecular and neurobiological mechanisms in which CRZ triggers the PMR.

    However, there are some broad concerns/comments I had with this manuscript. The authors provide clear evidence that CRZ signaling plays a major role in the PMR of D. melanogaster, however, they provide no evidence that CRZ signaling is endogenous, as they did not check for expression in the MAGs of D. melanogaster males. Additionally, while the authors show that manipulating Crz in males leads to dysregulated seminal fluid expression and impaired PMR in BPH, the authors also find that CRZ injection in males in and of itself impairs PMR in BPH. The authors do not really address what this seemingly contradictory result could mean. While a lot of the figures have replicate numbers, the authors do not factor in replicate as an effect into their models, which they ideally should do.

    Finally, while the discussion is generally well-written, it lacks a broader conclusion about the wider implications of this study and what future work building on this could look like.

  3. Reviewer #2 (Public review):

    Summary:

    The work presented by Zhang and coauthors in this manuscript presents the study of the neuropeptide corazonin in modulating the post-mating response of the brown planthopper, with further validation in Drosophila melanogaster. To obtain their results, the authors used several different techniques that orthogonally demonstrate the involvement of corazonin signalling in regulating the female post-mating response in these species.

    They first injected synthetic corazonin peptide into female brown planthoppers, showing altered mating receptivity in virgin females and a higher number of eggs laid after mating. The role of corazonin in controlling these post-mating traits has been further validated by knocking down the expression of the corazonin gene by RNA interference and through CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis of the gene. Further proof of the importance of corazonin signalling in regulating the female post-mating response has been achieved by knocking down the expression or mutagenizing the gene coding for the corazonin receptor.

    Similar results have been obtained in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, suggesting that corazonin signalling is involved in controlling the female post-mating response in multiple insect species.
    Notably, the authors also show that corazonin controls gene expression in the male accessory glands and that disruption of this pathway in males compromises their ability to elicit normal post-mating responses in their mates.

    Strengths:

    The study of the signalling pathways controlling the female post-mating response in insects other than Drosophila is scarce, and this limits the ability of biologists to draw conclusions about the evolution of the post-mating response in female insects. This is particularly relevant in the context of understanding how sexual conflict might work at the molecular and genetic levels, and how, ultimately, speciation might occur at this level. Furthermore, the study of the post-mating response could have practical implications, as it can lead to the development of control techniques, such as sterilization agents.

    The study, therefore, expands the knowledge of one of the signalling pathways that control the female post-mating response, the corazonin neuropeptide. This pathway is involved in controlling the post-mating response in both Nilaparvata lugens (the brown planthopper) and Drosophila melanogaster, suggesting its involvement in multiple insect species.

    The study uses multiple molecular approaches to convincingly demonstrate that corazonin controls the female post-mating response.

    Weaknesses:

    The data supporting the main claims of the manuscript are solid and convincing. The statistical analysis of some of the data might be improved, particularly by tailoring the analysis to the type of data that has been collected.

    In the case of the corazonin effect in females, all the data are coherent; in the case of CRISPR-Cas9-induced mutagenesis, the analysis of the behavioural trait in heterozygotes might have helped in understanding the haplosufficiency of the gene and would have further proved the authors' point.

    Less consistency was achieved in males (Figure 5): the authors show that injection of CRZ and RNAi of crz, or mutant crz, has the same effect on male fitness. However, the CRZ injection should activate the pathway, and crz RNAi and mutant crz should inhibit the pathway, yet they have the same effect. A comment about this discrepancy would have improved the clarity of the manuscript, pointing to new points that need to be clarified and opening new scientific discussion.