Asymmetric neural entrainment at resonance frequencies underlies unilateral spatial neglect
Curation statements for this article:-
Curated by eLife
eLife Assessment
This valuable study uses EEG and computational modeling to investigate hemispheric oscillatory asymmetries in unilateral spatial neglect. The work benefits from rare patient data and a careful multimethod approach. However, the evidence is incomplete because key assumptions about alpha‑band entrainment and methodological confounds such as lesion variability and eye‑movement artifacts remain insufficiently addressed.
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (eLife)
Abstract
Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is a common consequence of right-hemisphere stroke, traditionally attributed to structural lesions and dysfunctional attention networks. However, the brain is fundamentally a rhythmic and dynamical system, and how disrupted neural synchronization underlies USN remains unknown. We recorded steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs; 3 - 30 Hz flicker) in stroke patients with USN, without USN, and healthy controls. Only the USN group exhibited significant hemispheric asymmetry at 9 Hz, driven by exaggerated responses in the intact hemisphere rather than suppression in the lesioned hemisphere. This effect appeared only during stimulation, not at rest, indicating its specificity to sensory processing. The enhanced 9 Hz entrainment in the intact hemisphere was accompanied by increased phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) between alpha phase and gamma amplitude, reflecting systematic coordination of high-frequency activity. Transfer entropy analysis further revealed increased feedforward information flow from the right visual to the left frontal cortex, highlighting large-scale asymmetry. To explore the mechanism underlying this frequency-specific bias, we implemented a coupled-oscillator model. The model showed that the hemispheric asymmetry arises from resonance between intrinsic alpha rhythms and external input, amplified by asymmetric right-to-left interhemispheric coupling. These findings suggest that USN arises from a selective impairment of alpha-band synchrony capacity. This study offers a novel framework conceptualizing USN as a disorder of disrupted oscillatory dynamics underlying spatial attention, and points toward frequency-specific neuromodulatory intervention as a potential therapeutic approach.
Article activity feed
-
-
-
eLife Assessment
This valuable study uses EEG and computational modeling to investigate hemispheric oscillatory asymmetries in unilateral spatial neglect. The work benefits from rare patient data and a careful multimethod approach. However, the evidence is incomplete because key assumptions about alpha‑band entrainment and methodological confounds such as lesion variability and eye‑movement artifacts remain insufficiently addressed.
-
Reviewer #1 (Public review):
Summary:
Okazaki et al. showed flickering stimuli to patients with unilateral spatial neglect (USN) and measured EEG responses. They compared this with another patient group (post-stroke, but no USN) and healthy controls. The author's rationale was to entrain intrinsic brain rhythms using the flicker of different frequencies (3-30 Hz). Effects found unique to the 9-Hz stimulation condition differentiate USN patients from the other groups, leading them to conclude that USN can be characterized by increased hemispheric alpha asymmetry, driven by a relatively increased response in the intact hemisphere.
Strengths:
This study is principled empirical work that benefits from access to special patient groups of considerable size (about 60 stroke patients in total, and 20 USN). The authors use state-of-the-art …
Reviewer #1 (Public review):
Summary:
Okazaki et al. showed flickering stimuli to patients with unilateral spatial neglect (USN) and measured EEG responses. They compared this with another patient group (post-stroke, but no USN) and healthy controls. The author's rationale was to entrain intrinsic brain rhythms using the flicker of different frequencies (3-30 Hz). Effects found unique to the 9-Hz stimulation condition differentiate USN patients from the other groups, leading them to conclude that USN can be characterized by increased hemispheric alpha asymmetry, driven by a relatively increased response in the intact hemisphere.
Strengths:
This study is principled empirical work that benefits from access to special patient groups of considerable size (about 60 stroke patients in total, and 20 USN). The authors use state-of-the-art established methods to (1) deliver and (2) quantify the responses to the flicker stimulation in the EEG recordings. In addition, they use phase-coupling measures to investigate cross-frequency coupling (here: alpha-gamma) and a measure of directed connectivity between brain areas, transfer entropy. The results are supported by means of simulations using a coupled-oscillators model.
Weaknesses:
In my eyes, the major conceptual weakness of the study is that the authors make the a priori assumption that the flicker stimulation entrains intrinsic brain rhythms, especially alpha (9 Hz). To date, there is no direct (and only equivocal indirect) evidence that alpha rhythms can be entrained with periodic visual stimulation. In the present study, the assumption of alpha entrainment permeates some analytical decisions - where it would be possible to separate stimulus-driven from intrinsic rhythms more strongly than is currently the case, potentially yielding deeper insights into the oscillopathy of USN - and, ultimately, the interpretation of the results. Another potential issue to consider here is the analysis of gamma rhythms in EEG data, absent a control of miniature eye movements, a known problem (Yuval-Greenberg et al., 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.027) that may be exacerbated here, given that USN patients could show different auxiliary gaze behaviour.
-
Reviewer #2 (Public review):
This study investigates how altered neural oscillations may contribute to unilateral spatial neglect (USN) following right-hemisphere stroke. By combining steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), phase-amplitude coupling (PAC), transfer entropy (TE), and computational modeling, the authors aim to show that USN arises from disrupted hemispheric synchronization dynamics rather than simply from lesion extent. The integration of empirical EEG data with a mechanistic model is a major strength and offers a valuable new perspective on how frequency-specific neural dynamics relate to clinical symptoms.
The work has several notable strengths. The combination of experimental and modeling approaches is innovative and powerful, and the findings provide a coherent mechanistic framework linking abnormal neural …
Reviewer #2 (Public review):
This study investigates how altered neural oscillations may contribute to unilateral spatial neglect (USN) following right-hemisphere stroke. By combining steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), phase-amplitude coupling (PAC), transfer entropy (TE), and computational modeling, the authors aim to show that USN arises from disrupted hemispheric synchronization dynamics rather than simply from lesion extent. The integration of empirical EEG data with a mechanistic model is a major strength and offers a valuable new perspective on how frequency-specific neural dynamics relate to clinical symptoms.
The work has several notable strengths. The combination of experimental and modeling approaches is innovative and powerful, and the findings provide a coherent mechanistic framework linking abnormal neural entrainment to attentional deficits. The study also provides concrete evidence to support the potential for frequency-specific neuromodulatory interventions, which could have translational relevance.
At the same time, there are areas where the evidence could be clarified or contextualized further. The manuscript would benefit from more detailed characterization of lesions, since differences in lesion topography (white vs. gray matter, occipital vs. parietal areas) could greatly improve our understanding of the physiopathology causing unilateral spatial neglect and the altered neural oscillations reported. Methodological choices, such as focusing analyses on occipital electrodes rather than parietal sites, and the potential influence of volume conduction in transfer entropy analyses, also need clearer justification/elaboration. In addition, while the authors report several neural metrics, it is not always clear why SSVEP power was chosen as the primary correlate of clinical severity over other measures. More broadly, the manuscript would be strengthened by clearer definitions of dependent variables and reporting of software and toolboxes used.
Overall, the study makes a significant contribution by demonstrating that USN can be conceptualized as a disorder of disrupted oscillatory dynamics. With some clarifications and expansions, the paper will provide readers with a clearer understanding of both the strengths and the limitations of the evidence, and it will stand as a valuable reference for future work on oscillatory mechanisms in stroke and attention.
-
Author response:
Reviewer #1 (Public review):
Summary:
Okazaki et al. showed flickering stimuli to patients with unilateral spatial neglect (USN) and measured EEG responses. They compared this with another patient group (post-stroke, but no USN) and healthy controls. The author's rationale was to entrain intrinsic brain rhythms using the flicker of different frequencies (3-30 Hz). Effects found unique to the 9-Hz stimulation condition differentiate USN patients from the other groups, leading them to conclude that USN can be characterized by increased hemispheric alpha asymmetry, driven by a relatively increased response in the intact hemisphere.
Strengths:
This study is principled empirical work that benefits from access to special patient groups of considerable size (about 60 stroke patients in total, and 20 USN). The authors use …
Author response:
Reviewer #1 (Public review):
Summary:
Okazaki et al. showed flickering stimuli to patients with unilateral spatial neglect (USN) and measured EEG responses. They compared this with another patient group (post-stroke, but no USN) and healthy controls. The author's rationale was to entrain intrinsic brain rhythms using the flicker of different frequencies (3-30 Hz). Effects found unique to the 9-Hz stimulation condition differentiate USN patients from the other groups, leading them to conclude that USN can be characterized by increased hemispheric alpha asymmetry, driven by a relatively increased response in the intact hemisphere.
Strengths:
This study is principled empirical work that benefits from access to special patient groups of considerable size (about 60 stroke patients in total, and 20 USN). The authors use state-of-the-art established methods to (1) deliver and (2) quantify the responses to the flicker stimulation in the EEG recordings. In addition, they use phase-coupling measures to investigate cross-frequency coupling (here: alpha-gamma) and a measure of directed connectivity between brain areas, transfer entropy. The results are supported by means of simulations using a coupled-oscillators model.
Weaknesses:
In my eyes, the major conceptual weakness of the study is that the authors make the a priori assumption that the flicker stimulation entrains intrinsic brain rhythms, especially alpha (9 Hz). To date, there is no direct (and only equivocal indirect) evidence that alpha rhythms can be entrained with periodic visual stimulation. In the present study, the assumption of alpha entrainment permeates some analytical decisions - where it would be possible to separate stimulus-driven from intrinsic rhythms more strongly than is currently the case, potentially yielding deeper insights into the oscillopathy of USN - and, ultimately, the interpretation of the results. Another potential issue to consider here is the analysis of gamma rhythms in EEG data, absent a control of miniature eye movements, a known problem (Yuval-Greenberg et al., 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.027) that may be exacerbated here, given that USN patients could show different auxiliary gaze behaviour.
Reviewer #1 expressed concern that alpha entrainment is assumed a priori; however, our interpretation is based on the empirical observation of frequency-specific (9 Hz) hemispheric asymmetry, not on a prior assumption. This 9 Hz specificity is difficult to explain by a simple summation of stimulus-evoked responses and is more appropriately interpreted as a resonance phenomenon in the alpha band, which is close to the intrinsic resonance frequency of the visual system [1, 2]. In the revision, we will strengthen the conceptual distinction between stimulus-driven and intrinsic components and clarify that entrainment is a conclusion supported by our data and modeling.
Gamma contamination by eye movements is a valid theoretical concern. However, it is unlikely that saccadic spike potentials explain our α-γ coupling findings, due to several factors including timing constraints and spectral properties. In the revision, we will add explicit discussion of this limitation while explaining why our coupling patterns are more consistent with physiological neural coupling than with artifacts.
Reviewer #2 (Public review):
This study investigates how altered neural oscillations may contribute to unilateral spatial neglect (USN) following right-hemisphere stroke. By combining steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), phase-amplitude coupling (PAC), transfer entropy (TE), and computational modeling, the authors aim to show that USN arises from disrupted hemispheric synchronization dynamics rather than simply from lesion extent. The integration of empirical EEG data with a mechanistic model is a major strength and offers a valuable new perspective on how frequency-specific neural dynamics relate to clinical symptoms.
The work has several notable strengths. The combination of experimental and modeling approaches is innovative and powerful, and the findings provide a coherent mechanistic framework linking abnormal neural entrainment to attentional deficits. The study also provides concrete evidence to support the potential for frequency-specific neuromodulatory interventions, which could have translational relevance At the same time, there are areas where the evidence could be clarified or contextualized further. The manuscript would benefit from more detailed characterization of lesions, since differences in lesion topography (white vs. gray matter, occipital vs. parietal areas) could greatly improve our understanding of the physiopathology causing unilateral spatial neglect and the altered neural oscillations reported. Methodological choices, such as focusing analyses on occipital electrodes rather than parietal sites, and the potential influence of volume conduction in transfer entropy analyses, also need clearer justification/elaboration. In addition, while the authors report several neural metrics, it is not always clear why SSVEP power was chosen as the primary correlate of clinical severity over other measures. More broadly, the manuscript would be strengthened by clearer definitions of dependent variables and reporting of software and toolboxes used.
Overall, the study makes a significant contribution by demonstrating that USN can be conceptualized as a disorder of disrupted oscillatory dynamics. With some clarifications and expansions, the paper will provide readers with a clearer understanding of both the strengths and the limitations of the evidence, and it will stand as a valuable reference for future work on oscillatory mechanisms in stroke and attention.
We agree that further lesion characterization would be generally useful. However, as shown in Supplementary Figure 1, lesions in our USN cohort involved both cortical and subcortical regions, and cortical damage often extended into adjacent white matter. Therefore, a strict gray-versus-white-matter classification was not feasible. This anatomical diversity suggests that the frequency-specific hemispheric asymmetry observed here cannot be fully explained by lesion location or size alone, but rather may reflect altered network dynamics following right-hemisphere damage. We will clarify this point in the revised Discussion.
Regarding transfer entropy (TE) and volume conduction, TE is theoretically insensitive to zero-lag correlations and quantifies temporally directed information transfer. Furthermore, we used amplitude envelopes rather than raw oscillations as input, which should greatly reduce the risk of spurious causal estimation due to sinusoidal autocorrelation structure. Moreover, if such spurious connectivity due to autocorrelation had occurred, it would have been expected to appear equally in both feedforward and feedback directions. Therefore, the feedforward-limited (visual→frontal) asymmetry observed in our study cannot be explained by volume conduction or autocorrelation effects. We will maintain this position clearly in the revision.
Regarding other methodological points: we focused on occipital electrodes (O1/O2) because visual stimuli primarily drive the visual system (we also analyzed parietal sites but found no significant hemispheric differences; Figure 4). We chose SSVEP power for clinical correlation because it was the primary phenomenon distinguishing USN from non-USN patients. In the revision, we will clarify these points and include software and toolbox information.
We believe these revisions will substantially strengthen the manuscript and clarify the conceptual and methodological contributions of our study.
References
(1) Rosanova, M., Casali, A., Bellina, V., Resta, F., Mariotti, M., and Massimini, M. (2009). Natural frequencies of human corticothalamic circuits. J Neurosci 29, 7679-7685.
(2) Okazaki, Y.O., Nakagawa, Y., Mizuno, Y., Hanakawa, T., and Kitajo, K. (2021). Frequency- and Area-Specific Phase Entrainment of Intrinsic Cortical Oscillations by Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci 15, 608947.
-
