ATG2A engages RAB1A and ARFGAP1 positive membranes during autophagosome biogenesis
Curation statements for this article:-
Curated by eLife
eLife Assessment
This study provides valuable insights into the crosstalk between ATG2A with components of the early secretory pathway, namely RAB1A and ARFGAP1. The evidence supporting the claims is convincing. However, the manuscript would benefit from a more in-depth exploration of the details of the role of RAB1A in autophagy and the functional implications of its interaction with ATG2A. In addition, the molecular details of the role of ARFGAP1 in this complex need further clarification
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (eLife)
Abstract
Abstract
Autophagosomes form from seed membranes that expand through bulk-lipid transport via the bridge-like lipid transporter ATG2. The origins of the seed membranes and their relationship to the lipid transport machinery are poorly understood. Using proximity labeling and a variety of fluorescence microscopy techniques, we show that ATG2A localizes to extra-Golgi ARFGAP1 puncta during autophagosome biogenesis. ARFGAP1 itself is dispensable during macroautophagy, but among other proteins associating to these membranes, we find that RAB1 is essential. ATG2A co-immunoprecipitates strongly with RAB1A, and siRNA-mediated depletion of RAB1 blocks autophagy downstream of LC3B lipidation, similar to ATG2A depletion. Further, when either autophagosome formation or the early secretory pathway is perturbed, ARFGAP1 and RAB1A accumulate at ectopic locations with autophagic machinery. Our results suggest that ATG2A engages a RAB1A complex on select early secretory membranes at an early stage in autophagosome biogenesis.
Article activity feed
-
eLife Assessment
This study provides valuable insights into the crosstalk between ATG2A with components of the early secretory pathway, namely RAB1A and ARFGAP1. The evidence supporting the claims is convincing. However, the manuscript would benefit from a more in-depth exploration of the details of the role of RAB1A in autophagy and the functional implications of its interaction with ATG2A. In addition, the molecular details of the role of ARFGAP1 in this complex need further clarification
-
Reviewer #1 (Public review):
Summary:
D. Fuller et al. set out to study the molecular partners that cooperate with ATG2A, a lipid transfer protein essential for phagophore elongation, during the process of autophagy. Through a series of experiments combining microscopy and biochemistry, the authors identify ARFGAP1 and Rab1A as components of early autophagic membranes, which accumulate at the periphery of aberrant pre-autophagosomal structures induced by loss of ATG2. While ARFGAP1 has no apparent function in autophagy, the authors show that RAB1A is implicated in autophagy, although the mechanisms are not explored in the manuscript.
Strengths:
The work presented by Fuller et al. provides new insights into the composition of early autophagic membranes. The authors provide a series of MS experiments identifying proteins in close …
Reviewer #1 (Public review):
Summary:
D. Fuller et al. set out to study the molecular partners that cooperate with ATG2A, a lipid transfer protein essential for phagophore elongation, during the process of autophagy. Through a series of experiments combining microscopy and biochemistry, the authors identify ARFGAP1 and Rab1A as components of early autophagic membranes, which accumulate at the periphery of aberrant pre-autophagosomal structures induced by loss of ATG2. While ARFGAP1 has no apparent function in autophagy, the authors show that RAB1A is implicated in autophagy, although the mechanisms are not explored in the manuscript.
Strengths:
The work presented by Fuller et al. provides new insights into the composition of early autophagic membranes. The authors provide a series of MS experiments identifying proteins in close proximity to ATG2A, which is a valuable dataset for the field. Furthermore, they show for the first time the interaction between ATG2A and RAB1A, both in fed and starved conditions, which extends the characterisation of the pre-autophagosomal structures observed in ATG2 DKO cells.
Weaknesses:
The authors claim that this study elucidates the role of early secretory membranes in phagophore formation. However, this work is largely observational, which presents compelling evidence on the association between RAB1A GTPase and ATG2A without providing mechanistic insights into the functional relevance of this interaction. It remains unclear whether Rab1A depletion phenocopies ATG2A depletion in terms of autophagy progression or accumulation of pre-autophagosomal structures.
Furthermore, this research is conducted exclusively in HEK293 cells. Including at least one additional cell line would significantly strengthen the main findings (i.e., effects on LC3-II accumulation observed for RAB1A/B knockdown, given the previously published data on this topic).
A notable weakness of this manuscript, in this reviewer's opinion, lies in the discussion of the data in the context of existing literature. The discussion is rather short, mostly focused on the phenotype observed in ATG2 DKO cells. While this phenotype is certainly intriguing, it feels the discussion overlooks some important aspects, as outlined in the comments to the authors.
-
Reviewer #2 (Public review):
The mechanisms governing autophagic membrane expansion remain incompletely understood. ATG2 is known to function as a lipid transfer protein critical for this process; however, how ATG2 is coordinated with the broader autophagic machinery and endomembrane systems has remained elusive. In this study, the authors employ an elegant proximity labeling approach and identify two ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC)-localized proteins-Rab1 and ARFGAP1-as novel regulators of ATG2 during autophagic membrane expansion.
Their findings support a model in which autophagosome formation occurs within a specialized subdomain of the ER that is enriched in both ER exit sites (ERES) and ERGIC, providing valuable mechanistic insight. The overall study is well-executed and offers an important contribution to our …
Reviewer #2 (Public review):
The mechanisms governing autophagic membrane expansion remain incompletely understood. ATG2 is known to function as a lipid transfer protein critical for this process; however, how ATG2 is coordinated with the broader autophagic machinery and endomembrane systems has remained elusive. In this study, the authors employ an elegant proximity labeling approach and identify two ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC)-localized proteins-Rab1 and ARFGAP1-as novel regulators of ATG2 during autophagic membrane expansion.
Their findings support a model in which autophagosome formation occurs within a specialized subdomain of the ER that is enriched in both ER exit sites (ERES) and ERGIC, providing valuable mechanistic insight. The overall study is well-executed and offers an important contribution to our understanding of autophagy.
Specific Comments
(1) Integration with Prior Literature
The data convincingly implicate the ERES-ERGIC interface in autophagosome biogenesis. It would strengthen the manuscript to discuss previous studies reporting ERES and ERGIC remodeling and formation of ERERS-ERGIC contact sites (PMID: 34561617; PMID: 28754694) in the context of the current findings.(2) Experimental Conditions
In Figures 2A-C and Figure 4, it is unclear how the cells were treated. Were they starved in EBSS? This information should be included in the corresponding figure legends.(3) LC3 Lipidation vs. Cleavage
In Figure 2A, ARFGAP1 knockdown appears to reduce LC3 lipidation without affecting Halo-LC3 cleavage. Clarifying this observation would help readers better understand the functional specificity of ARFGAP1 in the pathway.(4) Use of HT-mGFP in Figure 2C
It should be clarified whether the assay in Figure 2C was performed in the presence of HT-mGFP. Explaining the rationale would aid the interpretation of the results.(5) COPII Inhibition Strategy
The authors used the dominant-active SAR1(H79G) mutant to inhibit COPII function. While this is effective in in vitro budding assays, the GDP-locked mutant SAR1(T39N) has been shown to be more effective in blocking COPII-mediated trafficking in cells. Including SAR1(T39N) in the analysis would provide stronger support for the conclusions. -
Reviewer #3 (Public review):
The manuscript by Fuller et al describes a crosstalk between ARTG2A with components of the early secretory pathway, namely RAB1A and ARFGAP1. They show that ATG2A is recruited to membranes positive for RAB1A, which they also show to interact with ATG2A. In agreement with earlier findings by other groups, silencing RAB1A negatively affects autophagy. While ARFGAP1 was also found on ATG2A-positive membranes, silencing ARFGAP1 had no impact on autophagy. Notably, these ARFGAP1-positive membranes are not Golgi membranes.
The findings are interesting, and in general, the data are of good quality; however, I have outstanding questions. An answer to any of these questions might strengthen the manuscript:
(1) Are the membranes to which ATG2A is recruited a form of ERGIC?
(2) Figure 3A/B: Is it possible to show a …
Reviewer #3 (Public review):
The manuscript by Fuller et al describes a crosstalk between ARTG2A with components of the early secretory pathway, namely RAB1A and ARFGAP1. They show that ATG2A is recruited to membranes positive for RAB1A, which they also show to interact with ATG2A. In agreement with earlier findings by other groups, silencing RAB1A negatively affects autophagy. While ARFGAP1 was also found on ATG2A-positive membranes, silencing ARFGAP1 had no impact on autophagy. Notably, these ARFGAP1-positive membranes are not Golgi membranes.
The findings are interesting, and in general, the data are of good quality; however, I have outstanding questions. An answer to any of these questions might strengthen the manuscript:
(1) Are the membranes to which ATG2A is recruited a form of ERGIC?
(2) Figure 3A/B: Is it possible to show a better example? The difference is barely detectable by eye. Since immunoblotting is not really a quantitative method, I think that such a weak effect is prone to be wrong. Is there another tool/assay to validate this result?
(3) Is the curvature-sensitive region of ARFGAP1 required for its co-localization with ATG2A?
(4) What does Rab1A do? What is its effector? Or does the GTPase itself remodel the membrane?
(5) What about Arf1? It appears that the role of ARFGAP1 is unrelated to Arf1 and COPI? Thus, one would predict that Arf1 does not localize to these structures and does not affect ATG2A function.
(6) Does ARFGAP1 promote fission of the membrane from its donor compartment?
(7) What are ARFGAP1 and Rab1A recruited to? What is the lipid composition or protein that recruits these two players to regulate autophagy?
-
-
-
