Interleukin-4 induces CD11c+ microglia leading to amelioration of neuropathic pain in mice

Curation statements for this article:
  • Curated by eLife

    eLife logo

    eLife Assessment

    This study is important as it highlighted how IL-4 regulates the reactive state of a specific microglial population by increasing the proportion of CD11c+ microglial cells and ultimately suppressing neuropathic pain. It provided convincing evidence on the pain-resolving roles of microglia. However, the authors are encouraged to clarify data interpretation and integrate the study's findings into the existing knowledge about microglia, monocytes, and macrophages.

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Neuropathic pain, a debilitating chronic pain condition, is a major clinical challenge. The pleiotropic cytokine interleukin-4 (IL-4) has been shown to suppress neuropathic pain in rodent models, but its underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we show that intrathecal administration of IL-4 to mice with spinal nerve transection (SpNT) increased the number of CD11c + microglia (a microglia subset important for pain remission) in the spinal dorsal horn (SDH) and that this effect of IL-4 was essential for its ameliorating effect on SpNT-induced pain hypersensitivity. Furthermore, in mice with spared nerve injury (SNI), another model in which pain remission does not occur, the emergence of CD11c + SDH microglia was curtailed, but intrathecal IL-4 increased their emergence and ameliorated pain hypersensitivity in a CD11c + microglia-dependent manner. Our study reveals a mechanism by which intrathecal IL-4 ameliorates pain hypersensitivity after nerve injury and provides evidence that IL-4 increases CD11c + microglia with a function that ameliorates neuropathic pain.

Article activity feed

  1. eLife Assessment

    This study is important as it highlighted how IL-4 regulates the reactive state of a specific microglial population by increasing the proportion of CD11c+ microglial cells and ultimately suppressing neuropathic pain. It provided convincing evidence on the pain-resolving roles of microglia. However, the authors are encouraged to clarify data interpretation and integrate the study's findings into the existing knowledge about microglia, monocytes, and macrophages.

  2. Reviewer #1 (Public review):

    Summary:

    Kohno et al. examined whether the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-4 attenuates neuropathic pain by promoting the emergence of antinociceptive microglia in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. In two models of neuropathic pain following peripheral nerve injury, intrathecal administration of IL-4 once a day for 3 days from day 14 to day 17 after injury, attenuates hypersensitivity to mechanical stimuli in the hind paw ipsilateral to nerve injury. Such an antinociceptive effect correlates with a higher number of CD11c+microglia in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord which is the termination area for primary afferent fibres injured in the periphery. Interestingly, CD11c+ microglia emerge spontaneously in the dorsal horn in concomitance with the resolution of pain in the spinal nerve model of pain, but not in the spared nerve injury model where pain does not resolve, confirming that this cluster of microglia is involved in resolution pain.

    Based on existing evidence that the receptor for IL-4, namely IL-4R, is expressed by microglia, the authors suggest that IL-4R mediates IL-4 effect in microglia including up-regulation of Igf1 mRNA. They have previously reported that IGF-1 can attenuate pain neuron activity in the spinal cord.

    Strengths:

    This study includes cutting-edge techniques such as flow cytometry analysis of microglia and transgenic mouse models.

    Weaknesses:

    The conclusion of this paper is supported by data, but the interpretation of some data requires clarification.

  3. Reviewer #2 (Public review):

    Summary:

    The authors aimed to investigate how IL-4 modulates the reactive state of microglia in the context of neuropathic pain. Specifically, they sought to determine whether IL-4 drives an increase in CD11c+ microglial cells, a population associated with anti-inflammatory responses and whether this change is linked to the suppression of neuropathic pain. The study employs a combination of behavioral assays, pharmacogenetic manipulation of microglial populations, and characterization of microglial markers to address these questions.

    Strengths:

    The methodological approach in this study is robust, providing convincing evidence for the proposed mechanism of IL-4-mediated microglial regulation in neuropathic pain. The experimental design is well thought out, utilizing two distinct neuropathic pain models (SpNT and SNI), each yielding different outcomes. The SpNT model demonstrates spontaneous pain remission and an increase in the CD11c+ microglial population, which correlates with pain suppression. In contrast, the SNI model, which does not show spontaneous pain remission, lacks a significant increase in CD11c+ microglia, underscoring the specificity of the observed phenomenon. This design effectively highlights the role of the CD11c+ microglial population in pain modulation. The use of behavioral tests provides a clear functional assessment of IL-4 manipulation, and pharmacogenetic tools allow for precise control of microglial populations, minimizing off-target effects. Notably, the manipulation targets the CD11c promoter, which presumably reduces the risk of non-specific ablation of other microglial populations, strengthening the experimental precision. Moreover, the thorough characterization of microglial markers adds depth to the analysis, ensuring that the changes in microglial populations are accurately linked to the behavioral outcomes.

    Weaknesses:

    One potential limitation of the study is that the mechanistic details of how IL-4 induces the observed shift in microglial populations are not fully explored. While the study demonstrates a correlation between IL-4 and CD11c+ microglial cells, a deeper investigation into the specific signaling pathways and molecular processes driving this population shift would greatly strengthen the conclusions. Additionally, the paper does not clearly integrate the findings into the broader context of microglial reactive state regulation in neuropathic pain.