Targeting SLC7A11-mediated cysteine metabolism for the treatment of trastuzumab resistant HER2 positive breast cancer

Curation statements for this article:
  • Curated by eLife

    eLife logo

    eLife Assessment

    This study presents a useful finding that targeting amino acid metabolism can overcome Trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer. The evidence supporting the claims of the authors is solid and the authors may want to validate their results in additional cell lines to strengthen their conclusions. Moreover, the authors should clarify the source of patient samples and why the manuscript focused on epigenetic regulations instead of major transcription factors. The work will be of interest to scientists working in the field of breast cancer.

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Trastuzumab resistance remains a challenge for HER2 positive breast cancer treatment. Targeting metabolic reprogramming would provide novel insights for therapeutic strategies. Here, we integrated metabolomics, transcriptomics and epigenomics data of trastuzumab sensitive and primary resistant HER2 positive breast cancer to identify metabolic alterations. Aberrant cysteine metabolism was discovered in trastuzumab primary resistant breast cancer at both circulating and intracellular levels. The inhibition of SLC7A11 and cysteine starvation could synergize with trastuzumab to induce ferroptosis. Mechanistically, increased H3K4me3 and decreased DNA methylation enhanced SLC7A11 transcription and cystine uptake in trastuzumab resistant breast cancer. The regulation of epigenetic modifications modulated cysteine metabolism and ferroptosis sensitivity. These results revealed an innovative approach for overcoming trastuzumab resistance by targeting specific amino acid metabolism.

Article activity feed

  1. eLife Assessment

    This study presents a useful finding that targeting amino acid metabolism can overcome Trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer. The evidence supporting the claims of the authors is solid and the authors may want to validate their results in additional cell lines to strengthen their conclusions. Moreover, the authors should clarify the source of patient samples and why the manuscript focused on epigenetic regulations instead of major transcription factors. The work will be of interest to scientists working in the field of breast cancer.

  2. Reviewer #1 (Public review):

    Summary:

    Hua et al show how targeting amino acid metabolism can overcome Trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer.

    Strengths:

    The authors used metabolomics, transcriptomics and epigenomics approaches in vitro and in preclinical models to demonstrate how trastuzumab-resistant cells utilize cysteine metabolism.

    Weaknesses:

    However, there are some key aspects that needs to be addressed.

    Major:

    (1) Patient Samples for Transcriptomic Analysis: It is unclear from the text whether tumor tissues or blood samples were used for the transcriptomic analysis. This distinction is crucial, as these two sample types would yield vastly different inferences. The authors should clarify the source of these samples.

    (2) The study only tested one trastuzumab-resistant and one trastuzumab-sensitive cell line. It is unclear whether these findings are applicable to other HER2-positive tumor cell lines, such as HCC1954. The authors should validate their results in additional cell lines to strengthen their conclusions.

    (3) Relevance to Metastatic Disease: Trastuzumab resistance often arises in patients during disease recurrence, which is frequently associated with metastasis. However, the mouse experiments described in this paper were conducted only in the primary tumors. This article would have more impact if the authors could demonstrate that the combination of Erastin or cysteine starvation with trastuzumab can also improve outcomes in metastasis models.

    Minor:

    (1) The figures lack information about the specific statistical tests used. Including this information is essential to show the robustness of the results.

    (2) Figure 3K Interpretation: The significance asterisks in Figure 3K do not specify the comparison being made. Are they relative to the DMSO control? This should be clarified.

  3. Reviewer #2 (Public review):

    In this manuscript, Hua et al. proposed SLC7A11, a protein facilitating cellular cystine uptake, as a potential target for the treatment of trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer. If this claim holds true, the finding would be of significance and might be translated to clinical practice. Nevertheless, this reviewer finds that the conclusion was poorly supported by the data.

    Notably, most of the data (Figures 2-6) were based on two cell lines - JIMT1 as a representative of trastuzumab-resistant cell line, and SKBR3 as a representative of trastuzumab sensitive cell line. As such, these findings could be cell-line specific while irrelevant to trastuzumab sensitivity at all. Furthermore, the authors claimed ferroptosis simply based on lipid peroxidation (Figure 3). Cell viability was not determined, and the rescuing effects of ferroptosis inhibitors were missing. The xenograft experiments were also suspicious (Figure 4). The description of how cysteine starvation was performed on xenograft tumors was lacking, and the compound (i.e., erastin) used by the authors is not suitable for in vivo experiments due to low solubility and low metabolic stability. Finally, it is confusing why the authors focused on epigenetic regulations (Figures 5 & 6), without measuring major transcription factors (e.g., NRF2, ATF4) which are known to regulate SLC7A11.

    To sum up, this reviewer finds that the most valuable data in this manuscript is perhaps Figure 1, which provides unbiased information concerning the metabolic patterns in trastuzumab-sensitive and primary resistant HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

  4. Author response:

    Public Reviews:

    Reviewer #1 (Public review):

    Summary:

    Hua et al show how targeting amino acid metabolism can overcome Trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer.

    Strengths:

    The authors used metabolomics, transcriptomics and epigenomics approaches in vitro and in preclinical models to demonstrate how trastuzumab-resistant cells utilize cysteine metabolism.

    Thank you for your valuable comments. We would like to extend our appreciation for your efforts. Your constructive suggestion would help improve our research.

    Weaknesses:

    However, there are some key aspects that needs to be addressed.

    Major:

    (1) Patient Samples for Transcriptomic Analysis: It is unclear from the text whether tumor tissues or blood samples were used for the transcriptomic analysis. This distinction is crucial, as these two sample types would yield vastly different inferences. The authors should clarify the source of these samples.

    Thank you for your valuable comments. In the transcriptomic analysis, we included the data of HER2 positive breast cancer patients who received trastuzumab in I-SPY2 trial (GSE181574). Tumor tissues were used in this dataset.

    (2) The study only tested one trastuzumab-resistant and one trastuzumab-sensitive cell line. It is unclear whether these findings are applicable to other HER2-positive tumor cell lines, such as HCC1954. The authors should validate their results in additional cell lines to strengthen their conclusions.

    Thank you for your valuable comments. We agree with your opinion, and the exploration of multiple cell lines would make our research findings more comprehensive. This is a limitation of our study, and we would continue to improve our design and methods in future experiments.

    (3) Relevance to Metastatic Disease: Trastuzumab resistance often arises in patients during disease recurrence, which is frequently associated with metastasis. However, the mouse experiments described in this paper were conducted only in the primary tumors. This article would have more impact if the authors could demonstrate that the combination of Erastin or cysteine starvation with trastuzumab can also improve outcomes in metastasis models.

    Thank you for your valuable comments. We agree with your suggestions. The exploration of metastatic disease would make our research more meaningful and help better address clinical key issues. In our future studies, we will continue to investigate the association between the invasive and metastatic capabilities of trastuzumab resistant HER2 positive breast cancer and cysteine metabolism.

    Minor:

    (1) The figures lack information about the specific statistical tests used. Including this information is essential to show the robustness of the results.

    Thank you for your valuable comments. We would include the statistical information in our figure legends.

    (2) Figure 3K Interpretation: The significance asterisks in Figure 3K do not specify the comparison being made. Are they relative to the DMSO control? This should be clarified.

    Thank you for your valuable comments. We would clarify the comparison information in our figure legends.

    Reviewer #2 (Public review):

    In this manuscript, Hua et al. proposed SLC7A11, a protein facilitating cellular cystine uptake, as a potential target for the treatment of trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer. If this claim holds true, the finding would be of significance and might be translated to clinical practice. Nevertheless, this reviewer finds that the conclusion was poorly supported by the data.

    Notably, most of the data (Figures 2-6) were based on two cell lines - JIMT1 as a representative of trastuzumab-resistant cell line, and SKBR3 as a representative of trastuzumab sensitive cell line. As such, these findings could be cell-line specific while irrelevant to trastuzumab sensitivity at all. Furthermore, the authors claimed ferroptosis simply based on lipid peroxidation (Figure 3). Cell viability was not determined, and the rescuing effects of ferroptosis inhibitors were missing. The xenograft experiments were also suspicious (Figure 4). The description of how cysteine starvation was performed on xenograft tumors was lacking, and the compound (i.e., erastin) used by the authors is not suitable for in vivo experiments due to low solubility and low metabolic stability. Finally, it is confusing why the authors focused on epigenetic regulations (Figures 5 & 6), without measuring major transcription factors (e.g., NRF2, ATF4) which are known to regulate SLC7A11.

    To sum up, this reviewer finds that the most valuable data in this manuscript is perhaps Figure 1, which provides unbiased information concerning the metabolic patterns in trastuzumab-sensitive and primary resistant HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

    Thank you for your valuable comments. We agree with your suggestions. Your feedback would help enhance the quality of our research.

    (1) Our research was mainly conducted in JIMT1 (trastuzumab resistant) and SKBR3 (trastuzumab sensitive), and this is a limitation of our study. The experimental validation using different cell lines will make our research findings more persuasive. In our future research, we will continuously optimize experimental design and methods to make our findings more comprehensive.

    (2) The detection of ferroptosis in our research was mainly performed by evaluating the lipid peroxidation. Experiments measuring cell viability and rescuing effects would help provide more evidence.

    (3) In xenograft experiments, the cysteine starvation was performed by feeding cysteine-free diet. The drug dissolution and other conditions were optimized by referring to previous relevant literature. We would clarify more details in our article.

    (4) Epigenetic modifications have been recognized as crucial factors in drug resistance formation. An increasing number of studies have emphasized the importance of epigenetic changes in regulating the abnormal expression of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes related to drug resistance. Currently, the role of epigenetic changes in the development of trastuzumab resistance in HER2 positive breast cancer is still in exploration. We tried to investigate the dysregulation of histone modifications and DNA methylation in trastuzumab resistant HER2 positive breast cancer. Our findings indicated that targeting H3K4me3 and DNA methylation could decrease SLC7A11 expression and induce ferroptosis. This would provide more evidence in exploring trastuzumab resistance mechanisms. We will provide a more detailed discussion in the article.

    We would like to extend our appreciation for your constructive suggestions and continue to improve our research in future experiments.