Crystal structure and catalytic mechanism of PL35 family glycosaminoglycan lyases with an ultrabroad substrate spectrum
Curation statements for this article:-
Curated by eLife
eLife Assessment
This manuscript reports on the crystal structures of two glycosaminoglycan (GAG) lyases from the PL35 family, along with in vitro enzyme activity assays and comprehensive structure-guided mutagenesis. While the study provides structural insights into the broad substrate specificity of these enzymes, the incomplete structural models, lack of key data such as Mn²⁺ binding confirmation, and reliance on basic docking methods diminish the overall impact. Although the work is useful for specialists in carbohydrate-active enzymes, additional data, and more rigorous analysis are required to present a complete study.
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (eLife)
Abstract
Recently, a new class of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) lyases (GAGases) belonging to PL35 family has been discovered with an ultrabroad substrate spectrum that can degrade three types of uronic acid-containing GAGs (hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate) or even alginate. In this study, the structures of GAGase II from Spirosoma fluviale and GAGase VII from Bacteroides intestinalis DSM 17393 were determined at 1.9 and 2.4 Å resolution, respectively, and their catalytic mechanism was investigated by the site-directed mutant of their crucial residues and molecular docking assay. Structural analysis showed that GAGase II and GAGase VII consist of an N-terminal (α/α) 7 toroid multidomain and a C-terminal two-layered β-sheet domain with Mn 2+ . Notably, although GAGases share similar folds and catalytic mechanisms with some GAG lyases and alginate lyases, they exhibit higher structural homology with alginate lyases than GAG lyases, which may present a crucial structural evidence for the speculation that GAG lyases with (α/α) n toroid and antiparallel β-sheet structures arrived by a divergent evolution from alginate lyases with the same folds. Overall, this study not only solved the structure of PL35 GAG lyases for the first time and investigated their catalytic mechanism, especially the reason why GAGase III can additionally degrade alginate, but also provided a key clue in the divergent evolution of GAG lyases that originated from alginate lyases.
Article activity feed
-
eLife Assessment
This manuscript reports on the crystal structures of two glycosaminoglycan (GAG) lyases from the PL35 family, along with in vitro enzyme activity assays and comprehensive structure-guided mutagenesis. While the study provides structural insights into the broad substrate specificity of these enzymes, the incomplete structural models, lack of key data such as Mn²⁺ binding confirmation, and reliance on basic docking methods diminish the overall impact. Although the work is useful for specialists in carbohydrate-active enzymes, additional data, and more rigorous analysis are required to present a complete study.
-
Reviewer #1 (Public review):
Summary:
This study aims to uncover molecular and structural details underlying the broad substrate specificity of glycosaminoglycan lyases belonging to a specific family (PL35). They determined the crystal structures of two such enzymes, conducted in vitro enzyme activity assays, and a thorough structure-guided mutagenesis campaign to interrogate the role of specific residues. They made progress towards achieving their aims but I see significant holes in data that need to be determined and in the authors' analyses.
Impact on the field:
I expect this work will have a limited impact on the field, although, with additional experimental work and better analysis, this paper will be able to stand on its own as a solid piece of structure-function analysis.
Strengths:
The major strengths of the study were the …
Reviewer #1 (Public review):
Summary:
This study aims to uncover molecular and structural details underlying the broad substrate specificity of glycosaminoglycan lyases belonging to a specific family (PL35). They determined the crystal structures of two such enzymes, conducted in vitro enzyme activity assays, and a thorough structure-guided mutagenesis campaign to interrogate the role of specific residues. They made progress towards achieving their aims but I see significant holes in data that need to be determined and in the authors' analyses.
Impact on the field:
I expect this work will have a limited impact on the field, although, with additional experimental work and better analysis, this paper will be able to stand on its own as a solid piece of structure-function analysis.
Strengths:
The major strengths of the study were the combination of structure and enzyme activity assays, comprehensive structural analysis, as well as a thorough structure-guided mutagenesis campaign.
Weaknesses:
There were several weaknesses, particularly:
(1) The authors claim to have done an ICP-MS experiment to show Mn2+ binds to their enzyme but did not present the data. The authors could have used the anomalous scattering properties of Mn2+ at the synchrotron to determine the presence and location of this cation (i.e. fluorescence spectra, and/or anomalous data collection at the Mn2+ absorption peak).
(2) The authors have an over-reliance on molecular docking for understanding the position of substrates bound to the enzyme. The docking analysis performed was cursory at best; Autodock Vina is a fine program but more rigorous software could have been chosen, as well we molecular dynamics simulations. As well the authors do not use any substrate/product-bound structures from the broader PL enzyme family to guide the placement of the substrates in the GAGases, and interpret the molecular docking models.
(3) The conclusion that the structures of GAGase II and VII are most similar to the structures of alginate lyases (Table 2 data), and the authors' reliance on DALI, are both questioned. DALI uses a global alignment algorithm, which when used for multi-domain enzymes such as these tends to result in sub-optimal alignment of active site residues, particularly if the active site is formed between the two domains as is the case here. The authors should evaluate local alignment methods focused on the optimization of the superposition of a single domain; these methods may result in a more appropriate alignment of the active site residues and different alignment statistics. This may influence the overall conclusion of the evolutionary history of these PL35 enzymes.
(4) The data on the GAGase III residue His188 is not well interpreted; substitution of this residue clearly impacts HA and HS hydrolysis as well. The data on the impact on alginate hydrolysis is weak, which could be due to the fact that the WT enzyme has poor activity against alginate to start with.
(5) The authors did not use the words "homology", "homologous", or "homolog" correctly (these terms mean the subjects have a known evolutionary relationship, which may or may not be known in the contexts the authors used these targets); the words "similarity" and "similar" are recommended to be used instead.
(6) The authors discuss a "shorter" cavity in GAGases, which does not make sense and is not supported by any figure or analysis. I recommend a figure with a surface representation of the various enzymes of interest, with dimensions of the cavity labeled (as a supplemental figure). The authors also do not specifically define what subsites are in the context of this family of enzymes, nor do they specifically label or indicate the location of the subsites on the figures of the GAGase II and IV enzyme structures.
-
Reviewer #2 (Public review):
Summary:
Wei et al. present the X-ray crystallographic structures of two PL35 family glycosaminoglycan (GAG) lyases that display a broad substrate specificity. The structural data show that there is a high degree of structural homology between these enzymes and GAGases that have previously been structurally characterized. Central to this are the N-terminal (α/α)7 toroid domain and the C-terminal two-layered β-sheet domain. Structural alignment of these novel PL35 lyases with previously deposited structures shows a highly conserved triplet of residues at the heart of the active sites. Docking studies identified potentially important residues for substrate binding and turnover, and subsequent site-directed mutagenesis paired with enzymatic assays confirmed the importance of many of these residues. A third PL35 …
Reviewer #2 (Public review):
Summary:
Wei et al. present the X-ray crystallographic structures of two PL35 family glycosaminoglycan (GAG) lyases that display a broad substrate specificity. The structural data show that there is a high degree of structural homology between these enzymes and GAGases that have previously been structurally characterized. Central to this are the N-terminal (α/α)7 toroid domain and the C-terminal two-layered β-sheet domain. Structural alignment of these novel PL35 lyases with previously deposited structures shows a highly conserved triplet of residues at the heart of the active sites. Docking studies identified potentially important residues for substrate binding and turnover, and subsequent site-directed mutagenesis paired with enzymatic assays confirmed the importance of many of these residues. A third PL35 GAGase that is able to turn over alginate was not crystallized, but a predicted model showed a conserved active site Asn was mutated to a His, which could potentially explain its ability to act on alginate. Mutation of the His into either Ala or Asn abrogated its activity on alginate, providing supporting evidence for the importance of the His. Finally, a catalytic mechanism is proposed for the activity of the PL35 lyases. Overall, the authors used an appropriate set of methods to investigate their claims, and the data largely support their conclusions. These results will likely provide a platform for further studies into the broad substrate specificity of PL35 lyases, as well as for studies into the evolutionary origins of these unique enzymes
Strengths:
The crystallographic data are of very high quality, and the use of modern structural prediction tools to allow for comparison of GAGase III to GAGase II/GAGase VII was nice to see. The authors were comprehensive in their comparison of the PL35 lyases to those in other families. The use of molecular docking to identify key residues and the use of site-directed mutagenesis to investigate substrate specificity was good, especially going the extra distance to mutate the conserved Asn to His in GAGase II and GAGase VII.
Weaknesses:
The structural models simply are not complete. A cursory look at the electron density and the models show that there are many positive density peaks that have not had anything modelled into them. The electron density also does not support the placement of a Mn2+ in the model. The authors indicate that ICP-MS was done to identify the metal, but no ICP-MS data is presented in the main text or supplementary. I believe the authors put too much emphasis on the possibility of GAGase III representing an evolutionary intermediate between GAG lyases and alginate lyases based on a single Asn to His mutation in the active site, and I don't believe that enough time was spent discussing how this "more open and shorter" catalytic cavity would necessarily mean that the enzyme could accommodate a broader set of substrates. Finally, the proposed mechanism does not bring the enzyme back to its starting state.
-
-
-
