Dynamic, single-cell monitoring of CAR T cell identity and activation with Raman spectroscopy
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (Arcadia Science)
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have reshaped treatment for cancers and immune-mediated diseases, yet their safety and efficacy depend on both the proliferation of engineered cells and their dynamic functional state — features that remain challenging to monitor in real-time clinical settings. Current methods require labels, extensive processing, and provide only static snapshots of cell identity and activation. Here, we introduce a surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and machine learning approach that enables label-free single-cell identification of engineered CAR T cells and time-resolved, semi-continuous monitoring of their functional activation state. Using the intrinsic vibrational signatures from live cells, we detect spectral differences resulting from engineered receptor expression in donor-derived CD19- and GD2-targeted CAR T cells (nine and five donors, respectively) with 81-85% donor-level accuracy and resolve dynamic antigen-specific activation trajectories with temporal precision. These capabilities stem from biochemical signatures consistent with processes such as receptor expression, tonic signalling, and immune synapse formation, demonstrating a single method that reports both cellular identity and activation state with biochemical specificity. Our results extend CAR T cell monitoring beyond static phenotyping and establish the potential of SERS-ML analysis for rapid, point-of-care assessment of engineered immune cells.
Article activity feed
-
Fig. 3b
style note on plot: does the heatmap offer different information than the line plot? the thin vertical lines in the heatmap are difficult to see
-
Discriminating peaks correspond with known Raman biochemical features resulting fromblood cell identity (Supplementary Fig. 5; Supplementary Table 4),20,29–35 including those fromDNA/RNA (adenine ring breathing 725-730 cm-1,
do you see spatial differences in the prominence of the different peaks? e.g. DNA/RNA-related peaks should be most prominent in the nucleus, etc.
-
biological fingerprint region on arectangular scan grid with ~30 μm spacing, exceeding both the laser spot size (~1.2-1.5 μm) andtypical cell diameters (7-12 μm
Given the small spot size, the laser is sampling different parts of the cells (e.g. nucleus, cytoplasm) which would result in different spectra (presumably). do you observe significant variations in spectra within cells?
-
All spectra were acquired with 100% power output: 30.47 mW at the sample for the 20xobjective and 26.34 mW for the 50x.
has autofluorescence from the glass coverslip and microscope slide been problematic, especially for low-mag objectives and at 785 nm excitation where glass is highly absoptive?
-
