A Unified Ramanujan-Inspired p-Series Deformation Framework for Gravitational Interaction: Mathematical Proofs, Physical Consistency, and Computational Realizations
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (PREreview)
Abstract
We present a unified, rigorously formulated p-series deformation framework for gravitational interaction inspired by classical Ramanujan-type series constructions. The theory is developed from first principles as a mathematically well-defined operator acting on radial gravitational potentials. We provide explicit proofs of convergence, boundedness, regularity, and asymptotic behavior, followed by physics-based consistency derivations establishing recovery of Newtonian gravity and controlled long-range suppression. A chemistry-consistent interpretation is introduced via interaction-kernel analogies familiar from statistical mechanics and molecular physics. The framework is complemented by explicit numerical implementations in Python and Java. This work establishes a mathematically rigorous, physically consistent, and computationally realizable foundation for scale-dependent gravitational modeling.
Article activity feed
-
This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a Structured PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/19826287.
Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint? PartlyAre the methods well-suited for this research? Somewhat appropriateAre the conclusions supported by the data? Highly supportedAre the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data? …This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a Structured PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/19826287.
Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint? PartlyAre the methods well-suited for this research? Somewhat appropriateAre the conclusions supported by the data? Highly supportedAre the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data? Highly appropriate and clearHow clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research? Neither clearly nor unclearlyIs the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge? Highly likelyWould it benefit from language editing? YesWould you recommend this preprint to others? Yes, but it needs to be improvedIs it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience? Yes, after minor changesCompeting interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The author declares that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.
-