Religion of Revolution: An inquiry into Ali Shariati's Redefinition of Islam as a Catalyst for Social and Political Change

  1. Shahzada Rahim Abbas

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. PREreview

    This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a Structured PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/21159533.

    Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint? Partly research gap in not explicit
    Are the methods well-suited for this research? Somewhat appropriate it was so good a little relies on secondary resources method is not explicit. diversity spectrum between hegel, ibn arabi, etc is not related well to each other
    Are the conclusions supported by the data? Somewhat supported as a normal narrative review is not bad some claims and quotations are scattered
    Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data? I don't know
    How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research? Somewhat clearly While it is useful to distinguish between Shariati's critical edge and his constructive proposals, the author would benefit from further exploring an important discursive nuance. Given his background, Shariati leaned significantly on literary rhetoric, and it was precisely his charismatic oratory—far more than his textual corpus—that captured popular attention. However, despite this popular influence, it was the Islamic fundamentalist faction that ultimately assumed social leadership and steered the revolutionary outcome. maybe at the other chance, some other local experts could help you more
    Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge? Not likely
    Would it benefit from language editing? Yes somewhat readability is so hard because of authors relying on Ms Office spell checker. it needs native check
    Would you recommend this preprint to others? Yes, but it needs to be improved it is good as an essay not really as research paper
    Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience? Yes, after minor changes as essay template, yes. i suggest to follow periodical conference about shariati. they would be attractive about this work

    Competing interests

    The author declares that they have no competing interests.

    Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

    The author declares that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.

  2. Version published to 10.2139/ssrn.5626972