A Comparative study between Microwaves and Ultrasound Assisted in-Situ Reduction of Platinum supported γ-Al2O3 using different Organic templates for Enhanced Catalytic Activity and Potential Applications

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

In this study, mesoporous alumina was synthesized and modified with two different surfactants: cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), a cationic surfactant, and pluronic P123, a non-ionic surfactant, using the sol-gel method. The synthesis involved the co-assembly of aluminum precursors with the surfactants, followed by calcination to remove the templates, resulting in a porous alumina structure that serves as a support. Platinum (Pt) was then loaded onto the surfactant-modified alumina support (CTAB) at a concentration of 0.9 wt. % using microwave-assisted solution (MAS) and ultrasonic techniques. The synthesized catalysts were characterized using nitrogen adsorption-desorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermal analysis, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to assess their textural properties, thermal stability, and morphology. The catalytic activity of the Pt-loaded alumina catalysts was evaluated for n-hexane dehydrocyclization, cyclohexane dehydrogenation, and ethanol dehydration. Both the ultrasonic technique and microwave irradiation were employed as in situ reduction methods to produce stable, well-dispersed platinum nanoparticles with average diameters not exceeding 6 nm. The catalytic performance studies indicated that the 0.9 Pt/Al 2 O 3 (MAS) nanocatalyst, produced using the microwave approach, exhibited 86% higher catalytic activity for n-hexane dehydrocyclization and cyclohexane dehydrogenation into benzene at 450°C compared to the ultrasonic method, which achieved 75% activity. In ethanol conversion, the 0.9 Pt/Al 2 O 3 (US) sample generated via sonication was the most active for ethanol dehydration to ethylene, yielding 84% ethylene and 16% acetaldehyde, outperforming the 0.9 Pt/Al 2 O 3 (MAS) nanocatalyst.

Article activity feed