Equitable Decarbonization Scenarios for Indian States: Integrating Household Demand-Side Shifts with Multi-Sector Supply-Side Interventions

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

As the world’s third-largest emitter, India’s ambition to reach net-zero emissions by 2070 prioritizes technocentric, supply-side measures. This strategy, often justified by poverty alleviation, masks deep-rooted inequality and accelerating environmental degradation. Using a high-resolution, state- and settlement-level dataset of household consumption emissions \cite{Bogra2025}, socio-metabolic scenarios to 2050 are constructed that systematically embed considerations of distributive fairness. Under business-as-usual, household emissions rise from 2,605 to over 10,000 MtCO$_2$eq—driven not by food (+43\% nationally) but by sharp non-food growth (+278–308\%), with rural per capita emissions surpassing urban in 23 of 36 states. Applying the Avoid–Shift–Improve framework \cite{Creutzig2018}, combined interventions (grid decarbonization, nutritionally adequate diets, reduced high-income travel) avoid 4,050 MtCO$_2$eq in 2050, yet residual emissions remain high. Crucially, mitigation potential is spatially uneven: dietary and agronomic shifts yield highest returns in high-food-emission states (e.g., Mizoram: 3.9 tCO$_2$eq/capita), decentralized renewables in high-non-food regions (e.g., rural Gujarat: 16 tCO$_2$eq/capita), and climate-smart intensification in populous states (UP, Bihar, MP). These findings indicate India’s just decarbonization requires move towards socio-metabolic fairness—aligning provisioning systems (food, mobility, energy) with decent living standards within ecological limits. This entails expanding low-carbon infrastructure alongside progressive consumption guidance, spatial design that lowers energy-service intensity, and support for low-emission livelihoods—ensuring climate action strengthens, rather than undermines, equity and sustainability.

Article activity feed