CBAM, Switchability and Market Headroom: A Portfolio Approach to Climate-Compatible Export Strategy in a Small Island Fossil-Fuel Exporter
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAM) create asymmetric risks for small, fossil-fuel-dependent exporters. We analyse Trinidad and Tobago’s 2020–2024 merchandise exports using HS6-by-market mirror data to compute CBAM Value-at-Risk (VaR) at €90/tCO₂, construct a Switching Potential Index (SPI) to measure product-level switchability, simulate partial-equilibrium reallocation of CBAM-affected flows, and solve a capacity-constrained export-portfolio optimisation problem. Exports peak at USD 19.9 bn in 2022 before falling 51% to USD 9.8 bn by 2024. CBAM VaR is highly concentrated (fertiliser mixtures alone exceed USD 500 m), and CBAM-covered products exhibit systematically lower SPI (median 0.17). CBAM-covered EU/UK exports embed about 0.61 MtCO₂, almost entirely in two strategic quadrants: “Reallocate now” and “Retain & decarbonize”. A modest 30% emissions-intensity reduction for the latter cuts export-embedded emissions by roughly 90 ktCO₂ (≈ 15% of CBAM-embedded emissions). Reallocation can offset EU (− USD 25.2 m) and UK (− USD 13.5 m) losses with Rest-of-World gains (+ USD 38.6 m), but creates a new concentration risk: a USD 369 m un-allocated gap, a 90.9% energy share, and a market HHI of 0.258 dominated by the United States. Capacity sweeps show that only with ~ 40–50% additional market headroom do Attainability reach 1.0 and HHI fall to 0.206. We conclude that T&T’s principal vulnerability is a market-capacity bottleneck; effective CBAM adjustment requires both targeted decarbonisation of low-SPI products and diversified headroom for non-EU/UK exports.