Key Actors in the Epistemic Community of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Their Impact on Sustainable Development Goals
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (PREreview)
Abstract
The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) has become a central framework for analyzing technology adoption across diverse fields, yet little is known about the epistemic community of scholars who sustain and expand this model and how their contributions connect to sustainable development. This study addresses the question of who the key actors are within the UTAUT research community and to what extent their work aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). A bibliometric analysis was conducted using Web of Science data from 2003 to 2025, applying Price’s, Lotka’s, Zipf’s, and Hirsch’s laws, together with co-authorship, cross-citation, and keyword co-occurrence network analyses, visualized through VOSviewer. The results reveal exponential growth in UTAUT-related publications, with 2,278 articles authored by 6,952 researchers, of whom only 31 can be considered central actors combining high productivity, impact, and thematic relevance. These authors are organized into distinct collaborative clusters, and their most influential works build directly upon Venkatesh et al.’s foundational contributions. Thematic evolution indicates a shift from general constructs of technology perception toward applications in mobile banking, education, and artificial intelligence. Overall, the findings confirm the vitality of UTAUT research and highlight its contributions to SDG 4 (quality education) and, to a lesser extent, SDG 11 (sustainable cities), SDG 3 (health), and others, underscoring the need to adapt adoption models to emerging sustainability challenges.
Article activity feed
-
This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a Structured PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/17379729.
Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint? YesAre the methods well-suited for this research? Somewhat appropriateAre the conclusions supported by the data? Highly supportedAre the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data? Highly …This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a Structured PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/17379729.
Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint? YesAre the methods well-suited for this research? Somewhat appropriateAre the conclusions supported by the data? Highly supportedAre the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data? Highly appropriate and clearHow clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research? Somewhat clearlyIs the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge? Highly likelyWould it benefit from language editing? NoWould you recommend this preprint to others? Yes, it's of high qualityIs it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience? Yes, as it isCompeting interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The author declares that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.
-