The risk and risk factors of chikungunya virus infection and rheumatological sequelae in a cohort of U.S. Military Health System beneficiaries: Implications for the vaccine era
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (PREreview)
Abstract
Understanding the risk of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection and rheumatic sequelae across populations, including travelers and the military, is critical. We leveraged healthcare delivery data of over 9 million U.S. Military Health System (MHS) beneficiaries to identify cases, and sampled controls, to estimate the risk of post-CHIKV rheumatic sequelae.
Methodology/principal findings
MHS beneficiary CHIKV infections diagnosed 2014–2018 were identified from the Disease Reporting System internet, TRICARE Encounter Data Non-Institutional, and Comprehensive Ambulatory/Professional Encounter Record systems. Non-CHIKV controls were matched (1:4) by age, gender, beneficiary status, and encounter date. The frequency of comorbidities and incident rheumatic diagnoses through December 2018 were derived from International Classification of Diseases codes and compared between cases and controls. Poisson regression models estimated the association of CHIKV infection with rheumatic sequelae. We further performed a nested case-control study to estimate risk factors for post-CHIKV sequelae in those with prior CHIKV. 195 CHIKV cases were diagnosed between July 2014 and December 2018. The median age was 42 years, and 43.6% were active duty. 63/195 (32.3%) of CHIKV cases had an incident rheumatic diagnosis, including arthralgia, polyarthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, and/or rheumatoid arthritis, compared to 156/780 (20.0%) of controls (p < 0.001). CHIKV infection remained associated with rheumatic sequelae (aRR = 1.579, p = 0.008) after adjusting for prior rheumatic disease and demography. Those with rheumatic CHIKV sequelae had a median 7 healthcare encounters (IQR 3–15). Among CHIKV infections, we found no association between post-CHIKV rheumatic sequelae and demography, service characteristics, or comorbidities.
Conclusions/significance
CHIKV infection is uncommon but associated with rheumatic sequelae among MHS beneficiaries, with substantial healthcare requirements in a proportion of cases with such sequelae. No demographic, clinical, or occupational variables were associated with post-CHIKV rheumatic sequelae, suggesting that prediction of these complications is challenging in MHS beneficiaries. These findings are important context for future CHIKV vaccine decision making in this and other populations.
Article activity feed
-
-
This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a Structured PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/10258620.
Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint? YesAre the methods well-suited for this research? Highly appropriateAre the conclusions supported by the data? Highly supportedAre the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data? Highly …This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a Structured PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/10258620.
Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint? YesAre the methods well-suited for this research? Highly appropriateAre the conclusions supported by the data? Highly supportedAre the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data? Highly appropriate and clear The data was easy to follow for readers with limited familiarity with this topic.How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research? Very clearly Next steps are clearly are clearly outlined with interesting suggestions for future research.Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge? Highly likelyWould it benefit from language editing? NoWould you recommend this preprint to others? Yes, it's of high qualityIs it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience? Yes, as it isCompeting interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
-