A reference bacterial genome dataset generated on the MinION™ portable single-molecule nanopore sequencer
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (GigaScience)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
Now published in GigaScience doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-3-22
Joshua Quick 1Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
2NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Find this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteAaron Quinlan 3University of Virginia, Virginia, US Find this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteNicholas J Loman 1Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Find this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteFor correspondence: n.j.loman@bham.ac.uk
A version of this preprint has been published in the Open Access journal GigaScience (see paper https://doi.org…
Now published in GigaScience doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-3-22
Joshua Quick 1Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
2NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Find this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteAaron Quinlan 3University of Virginia, Virginia, US Find this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteNicholas J Loman 1Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Find this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteFor correspondence: n.j.loman@bham.ac.uk
A version of this preprint has been published in the Open Access journal GigaScience (see paper https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-3-22), where the paper and peer reviews are published openly under a CC-BY 4.0 license.
These peer reviews were as follows:
Reviewer 1: http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/REVIEW.100173 Reviewer 2: http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/REVIEW.100172
-
-
-
-