Determination of pathogenic nature of organisms isolated from aerobic respiratory culture/Multiplex PCR (Biofire® FilmArray) of lower respiratory tract samples in a tertiary care facility using a stepwise explorative model

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients. 1 However, isolating organisms from respiratory samples often leads to diagnostic uncertainty due to the coexistence of colonizers, commensals, and contaminants. 2 To address this challenge, this study employed a structured, stepwise exploratory model to differentiate true pathogens from non-pathogens in aerobic respiratory cultures and Multiplex PCR (Biofire® FilmArray) results.

Methods

This prospective, longitudinal time-bound study was conducted over three months (August– October 2024) at a tertiary care center in northern India. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with positive lower respiratory tract samples (aerobic culture or Multiplex PCR (Biofire® FilmArray) were enrolled. Each isolate was independently classified by the treating clinician, microbiologist, and study investigator using a six-step clinical-pathological algorithm that incorporated clinical signs, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score trends, alternative infection sources, host factors, and outcome data. The final classification was determined by the investigator. Outcomes, including treatment response and mortality at 28 days, were compared across pathogen and non-pathogen groups.

Findings

Of the 145 included cases, 131 (90·3%) were classified as pathogens and 14 (9·7%) as non-pathogens. Cohen’s Kappa between investigator and microbiologist classifications was 0·28, indicating fair agreement. Among pathogen cases, 68 (51·9%) responded to treatment, while 63 (48·1%) did not respond to treatment in the pathogenic group. In contrast, 12 of 14 non-pathogen cases (85·7%) were not treated, with favourable outcomes in most, and only one unrelated death (7·1%).

Interpretation

The structured clinico -microbiological model strongly correlates with treatment outcomes, making it useful for differentiating infection from colonization. Crucially, microbiological detection alone doesn’t determine pathogenicity. Integrating clinical, laboratory, and outcome data is essential for rational antibiotic use and effective antimicrobial stewardship.

Funding

None

Article activity feed