Stepwise explorative model to determine pathogenicity of cultured blood isolates
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Blood culture remains the gold standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections (BSIs); however, distinguishing true pathogens from contaminants remains a critical challenge. Misclassification can lead to inappropriate antimicrobial use, prolonged hospitalization, and increased healthcare burden. This study proposes a structured, stepwise clinical-pathological model to differentiate pathogenic from non-pathogenic organisms in blood cultures.
In this prospective study at a tertiary hospital in northern India, 205 blood culture-positive adults were evaluated between August and October 2024. Organisms were classified as pathogenic or non-pathogenic using microbiological data and clinical indicators, including SOFA score, time to positivity, and site concordance, through a seven-step algorithm with 28-day outcome follow-up.
Among 1600 blood culture samples received, 205 isolates were positive for an organism, 160 (78.0%) were identified as pathogenic and 45 (22.0%) as non-pathogenic. The most common pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.0%), Acinetobacter baumannii (9.3%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6.3%), while non-pathogens were mainly coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS, 18.5%) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (8.3%). Mean Time to Positivity (TTP) was significantly shorter in pathogens (16.3 ± 8.0 hours) compared to non-pathogens (21.5 ± 10.1 hours; p < 0.001). Discordance was observed in 7 cases (3.4%) where clinicians labelled isolates as non-pathogens but microbiologists disagreed, and in 26 cases (12.7%) with the opposite interpretation. Overall agreement was 65.4%, with a Cohen’s kappa of 0.25, indicating fair inter-rater reliability. This stepwise clinical-microbiological model offers an effective framework for distinguishing pathogens from non-pathogens in BSIs. Incorporating SOFA score, TTP, and culture concordance enhances diagnostic stewardship, informs antimicrobial decisions, and supports prognostication, especially in resource-limited and high-burden healthcare settings.