IRF2 degradation tunes the innate immune response
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (Arcadia Science)
Abstract
The transcription factor IRF2 protects against skin inflammation in mice and humans but, paradoxically, promotes pyroptosis by inducing Gsdmd . How IRF2 activates some proinflammatory genes, but suppresses others is unclear. We show that skin inflammation in Irf2 -deficient mice is driven by IRF1 activation of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs). Chromatin profiling revealed that IRF1 and IRF2 occupy the same ISG regulatory sites, but as a weaker transcriptional activator, IRF2 limited ISG transcription by IRF1. Toll-like receptor signaling favored IRF1-driven transcription by inducing Irf1 . In addition, IRF1 recruited the ubiquitin ligase SPOP to ISG sites, resulting in proteasomal degradation of IRF2. This shift from IRF2 to IRF1 occupancy enhanced ISG transcription. Collectively, these findings define a hierarchical transcriptional circuit in which IRF2 limits IRF1 activity under homeostatic conditions but is displaced during an immune response, allowing IRF1-dependent gene programs central to innate immunity and autoinflammation.
Article activity feed
-
We propose that IRF1 brings SPOP to genomic sites occupied by IRF2 thereby promoting IRF2 degradation
Is there any evidence that recruitment of SPOP also targets other promoter-bound factors, like basal transcriptional machinery?
-
IRF2 limits IRF1 activity under homeostatic conditions but is displaced during an immune response, allowing IRF1-dependent gene programs central to innate immunity and autoinflammation
Congratulations on the elegant and thorough study! I was curious if there are there mutations in IRF2 coding or non-coding regulatory sequences that may link IRF2 with disease states/indications?
-