Synthetic bacteria with programmed cell targeting and protein injection suppress tumor growth in vivo

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Bacterial living therapeutics (BLTs) hold promise for treating cancer and other human diseases because they can be engineered and transported into the microbiota (e.g., of tumors, gastrointestinal tract) to deliver therapeutic payloads. Current approaches rely on the natural tropism of the bacterial chassis used and trigger the local release of protein cargoes, typically through active extracellular secretion or bacterial lysis. BLTs capable of targeting specific cellular subsets and delivering payloads intracellularly might provide new therapeutic opportunities and improve efficacy while reducing off-target effects. We used synthetic biology to develop BLTs that can deliver defined cargo proteins into the cytoplasm of target cells. We designed a modular synthetic bacterium with programmed adhesion to cells by targeting defined cell surface antigen and armed with an inducible type III secretion system (T3SS) for injection of a protein cargo of interest. As a proof of principle, we programmed synthetic bacteria to recognize the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and inject the catalytic fragments of the potent adenosine diphosphate-ribosyltransferase toxins ExoA and TccC3. These BLTs demonstrated the ability to trigger robust tumor cell death in vitro . Intratumoral administration of these synthetic bacteria suppressed tumor growth in vivo and prolonged the survival of treated animals when the tumor cells were recognized by the engineered bacteria. These results demonstrate the potential of programming cell targeting and controlled protein injection for the development of effective and specific BLTs.

Graphical Abstract

Article activity feed

  1. c; 108 CFU/mouse

    Do you think the drop in survival by the 30 day time point is due to bacteria population changes? Are fewer cells present? Do they behave as expected?

  2. Athymic Nude mice were subcutaneously implanted with HCT116 colon tumor

    It would be interesting to see the efficacy of bacterial treatment on liquid tumors as well.

  3. Harvested tumors from animals of all experimental groups contained similar numbers of viable bacteria (∼109 CFU/g of tumor) irrespective of the strain administered to the mice (Fig. S8).

    Did you assess the presence of viable bacterial cells in other tissues of the mouse? Knowing the ratio of tumor localized to other tissue localized cell counts could provide insight into the efficiency of targeting by the adhesins.