Lytic transglycosylase repertoire diversity enables daughter cell separation and antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli under acidic stress

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Peptidoglycan (PG) is an indispensable architectural element that imparts physical toughness and rigidity to the bacterial envelope. It is also a dynamic structure that undergoes continuous turnover or autolysis. Escherichia coli possesses redundant autolytic enzymes responsible for PG turnover; however, the rationale behind the existence of numerous autolytic enzymes remains incompletely understood. In this study, we elucidated the physiological roles of MltE and MltC, members of the lytic transglycosylase (LTG) family that catalyze the cleavage of glycosidic bonds between disaccharide subunits within PG strands. MltE and MltC are acidic LTGs that exhibit increased enzymatic activity and protein levels under acidic pH conditions, respectively. Deletion of these two LTGs results in a pronounced growth defect and elevated membrane permeability at acidic pH. Furthermore, these two LTGs are crucial for resistance against various antibiotics, particularly vancomycin. Intriguingly, inactivation of these LTGs induces a chaining morphology, indicative of daughter cell separation defects, only under acidic pH conditions. Simultaneous deletion of PG amidases, the known contributors to daughter cell separation, exacerbates the chaining phenotype at acidic pH. This suggests that the two LTGs may participate in the cleavage of glycan strands between daughter cells that cannot be resolved by PG amidases under acidic pH conditions. Collectively, our findings highlight the role of LTG repertoire diversity in facilitating bacterial survival and antibiotic resistance under stressful conditions.

Article activity feed

  1. Thank you for this super cool paper! I was wondering if I could ask some questions about your enzyme activity assays conducted with MltE and MltG. Is there any deeper biochemical knowledge, from structural biology or based on known chemistry mechanisms, that could explain why one enzyme has higher activity at acidic pH but the other has higher activity at neutral pH? Additionally, did you test the activity of MltC under acidic conditions? I understand that its in vivo expression levels increase at acidic pH but I’m curious if its activity is also different. Lastly, I couldn’t find you supplementary materials on biorxiv. Thank you for all of your hard work!