Nanos2+ cells give rise to germline and somatic lineages in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

In all animals, stem cell populations of varying potency facilitate regeneration and tissue homeostasis. Notably, germline stem cells in both vertebrates and invertebrates express highly conserved RNA-binding proteins, such as nanos, vasa and piwi . Interestingly, in animals, which are capable of whole-body regeneration, such as poriferans, hydrozoans and planarians, these genes are also expressed in somatic multi- and pluripotent stem cells, which led to the proposal that they had an ancestral role in all stem cells. While multi- and pluripotent interstitial stem cells have been identified in hydrozoans, they have not unambiguously been demonstrated in other cnidarian classes. Therefore, it is currently unclear if these stem cell systems share a common evolutionary origin or have been adapted individually in different lineages as homoplasy. We therefore aimed to characterize stem cells expressing conserved stem cell marker genes in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis , to gain insight of shared traits governing the regulation of this enigmatic cell type. Through single cell transcriptomics, we identify cell populations expressing the germline associated markers piwi1 and nanos2 in the soma and germline. Transgenic reporter genes reveal a lineage giving rise to somatic cells, consistent with a role as a multipotent stem cell population. Cell proliferation studies show that a fraction of nanos2+ reporter cells are cycling and CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene knockout show that nanos2+ progenitor cells are indispensable for male and female germline maintenance in Nematostella . This suggests nanos and piwi genes have a conserved role in somatic and germline stem cells in cnidarians.

Article activity feed

  1. Yet, while wildtype polyps start to spawn after about 4-5 months postfertilization, even after 1 year none of the mutants spawned any gametes, neither oocytes nor sperm, suggesting that the nanos2 mutants are sterile.

    Have you looked to see if your nanos2 mutants regenerate? Seems like the perfect genetic background to dissect the requirements for regeneration in animals that have (artificially) lost the ability to reproduce sexually!

  2. In the single cell spreads we can again detect nanos2::mOrange expression in all neuroglandular cell types (Fig. 2H-M). However, in both nanos2::mOrange and piwi1::mOrange transgenic animals, only a small fraction of neuroglandular cell types show low levels of residual fluorophore, and most are not expressing mOrange. Therefore, we conclude that both genes are most likely expressed in the precursor population, from which the neuroglandular cell types differentiate and carry on residual mOrange reporter protein.

    This is really interesting! From your methods it looks like you have to fix the single cell spreads for imaging - if it was possible to do this imaging live you could try to test this hypothesis explicitly by photobleaching/FRAP and see if any new mOrange protein is detectable in these mOrange+ cells.