“What slows the progress of health systems strengthening at subnational level? A Political Economy Analysis of three districts in Uganda”

  1. Justine Namakula
  2. Xavier Nsabagasani
  3. Ligia Paina
  4. Abigail Neel
  5. Chimwemwe Msukwa
  6. Daniela. C. Rodriguez
  7. Freddie Ssengooba

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

There is increasing recognition that without stronger health systems, efforts to improve global health and Universal Health Coverage cannot be achieved. Over the last three decades, initiatives to strengthen health systems in low-income countries have attracted huge investments in the context of achieving the Millennium Development Goals, the Sustainable Development Goals, as well as Universal Health Coverage. Yet, health system inadequacies persist, especially at the subnational level. Our paper presents a political economy analysis featuring a three-district case study in Uganda, where district-based health systems strengthening initiatives were implemented. The study sought to understand why health systems at the subnational level are failing to improve despite marked investments.

This problem-based political economy analysis draws from a document review and key informant interviews [N=49] at the central and district levels with government actors, development partners and civil society in three purposively selected districts. Available financial data extraction and analysis were used to complement qualitative data. We found that challenges in strengthening district health systems were numerous. Themes related to financing and planning broadly interacted to curtail progress on strengthening subnational level health systems. Specific challenges included inadequate financing, mismatch of resources and targets, convoluted financial flows, as well as unwieldy bureaucratic processes. Sticky issues related to planning process-included variations in planning cycles, conflicting interests among actors, insufficient community engagement, limited decision space, and distorted accounting mechanisms.

In conclusion, the political economy analysis lens was a useful tool that enabled understanding the dynamics of decision-making and resource allocation within district health systems as well as the performance in terms of implementation of the district work plans with existing resources. Whereas it is clear that the District health teams play a big role in service program implementation, the context in which they work needs to be improved in terms of sufficient resources, setting realistic targets, widening the decision space and capacity necessary to engage with other various stakeholders and effectively harmonize the implementation of the programs. Despite playing a crucial role of compensating for local shortfalls in resources, donor resources and engagements should not happen at the cost of the subnational voice in priority setting and decision-making.

Key messages

  • The challenges for Health Systems Strengthening at the district level are embedded in the structural reality as well as agency interests, power-relations, and actions.

  • Insufficient resources, delayed disbursement, and extreme conditional funding undercut the effectiveness of health system planning, management, performance, and accountability.

  • Distorted accountability mechanisms and conflicting incentives among subnational level actors limit district health stakeholders’ decision space, displace local priorities, and contribute to community engagement strategies are not robust.

  • Subnational level actors are alienated from the central and donor driven priorities and decision-making and further constrained by bureaucracies. Hence, their decision space needs amplification.

  • Implementing partners should harmonize accounting and reporting mechanisms and align them to the government systems.

  • Bureaucracy related to resource allocation, financial flows, and decision-making between central and district teams hinders timely implementation of services.

Article activity feed

  1. PREreview

    This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a Structured PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/10258604.

    Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint? Yes The introduction briefly explains the history behind HSS in Uganda and outlines the purpose of the article.
    Are the methods well-suited for this research? Highly appropriate
    Are the conclusions supported by the data? Highly supported The results ultimately analyzed the root causes which face Uganda's health care system. These findings are supported by the research and are not extrapolated beyond the data presented.
    Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data? Somewhat appropriate and clear There is only one data table with ambiguous significance at the bottom of the paper. To increase accessibility, providing a written explanation of the data points and clear labels for the graph would improve the effectiveness of their data presentation.
    How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research? Somewhat clearly They mention the ideal next steps, but describe them through a hypothetical analysis instead of clear actions that can be taken.
    Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge? Highly likely The preprint advances the use of a political economy analysis in the study of health systems. Their approach also expands current research and contributes new information to discussions of Uganda's health care system.
    Would it benefit from language editing? No
    Would you recommend this preprint to others? Yes, it's of high quality
    Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience? Yes, as it is

    Competing interests

    The author declares that they have no competing interests.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2023.11.09.23298302v1 on medRxiv