Plant Arbovirus Mobilizes a Vector Salivary Protein to Initiate Plant Infection
Curation statements for this article:-
Curated by eLife
eLife assessment
This study presents a useful set of experiments to test how a salivary protein might facilitate planthopper-transmitted rice stripe virus infection by interfering with callose deposition. If the conclusions can be confirmed, the study will enhance our understanding of the mechanisms mediating tripartite virus-insect vector-plant interactions and would be of general interest in plant science research. Whereas most experimental data is compelling, the conclusions rely on inadequate evidence for the salivary protein carbonic anhydrase being present two weeks post injection in the plant, which seems unlikely.
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (eLife)
- Plant Biology (eLife)
Abstract
Plant arboviruses rely heavily on insects’ feeding activities for successful transmission. Insect salivary proteins have been suggested to be essential for successful viral infection, but their exact mechanisms are largely unknown. In this study, we reveal that salivary factors from Laodelphax striatellus are necessary for infection of Rice stripe virus (RSV) in plants. A salivary carbonic anhydrase (LssaCA) is identified as an essential factor in promoting RSV infection. LssaCA interacts with a rice thaumatin-like protein (OsTLP) that has endo-β-1,3-glucanase activity and can degrade callose in plants. RSV infection induces callose deposition, which can be reversed by LssaCA. Furthermore, LssaCA directly binds to the RSV nucleocapsid protein (NP) in salivary glands, and the LssaCA-RSV NP complex still binds OsTLP and further increases its glucanase activity. This study provides new insights into the tripartite virus-insect vector-plant interaction, which is relevant to many agriculturally important plant arboviruses whose transmission is facilitated by insect salivary proteins.
Article activity feed
-
-
-
eLife assessment
This study presents a useful set of experiments to test how a salivary protein might facilitate planthopper-transmitted rice stripe virus infection by interfering with callose deposition. If the conclusions can be confirmed, the study will enhance our understanding of the mechanisms mediating tripartite virus-insect vector-plant interactions and would be of general interest in plant science research. Whereas most experimental data is compelling, the conclusions rely on inadequate evidence for the salivary protein carbonic anhydrase being present two weeks post injection in the plant, which seems unlikely.
-
Reviewer #1 (Public Review):
In this study, the authors identify an insect salivary protein participating viral initiate infection in plant host. They found a salivary LssaCA promoting RSV infection by interacting with OsTLP that could degrade callose in plants. Furthermore, RSV NP bond to LssaCA in salivary glands to form a complex, which then bond to OsTLP to promote degradation of callose.
The story focus on tripartite virus-insect vector-plant interaction, and is interesting. However, the study is too simple and poor-conducted. The conclusion is also overstated due to unsolid findings.
Major comments:
1. The key problem is that how long the LssCA functioned for in rice plant. Author declared that LssCA had no effect on viral initial infection, but on infection after viral inoculation. It is unreasonable to conclude that LssCA …Reviewer #1 (Public Review):
In this study, the authors identify an insect salivary protein participating viral initiate infection in plant host. They found a salivary LssaCA promoting RSV infection by interacting with OsTLP that could degrade callose in plants. Furthermore, RSV NP bond to LssaCA in salivary glands to form a complex, which then bond to OsTLP to promote degradation of callose.
The story focus on tripartite virus-insect vector-plant interaction, and is interesting. However, the study is too simple and poor-conducted. The conclusion is also overstated due to unsolid findings.
Major comments:
1. The key problem is that how long the LssCA functioned for in rice plant. Author declared that LssCA had no effect on viral initial infection, but on infection after viral inoculation. It is unreasonable to conclude that LssCA promoted viral infection based on the data that insect inoculated plant just for 2 days, but viral titer could be increased at 14 day post-feeding. How could saliva proteins, which reached phloem 12-14 days before, induce enough TLP to degrade callose to promote virus infection? It was unbelievable.2. Lines 110-116 and Fig. 1, the results of viruliferous insect feeding and microinjection with purified virus could not conclude the saliva factor necessary of RSV infection, because these two tests are not in parallel and comparable. Microinjection with salivary proteins combined with purified virus is comparable with microinjection with purified virus.
The second problem is how many days post viruliferous insect feeding and microinjection with purified virus did author detect viral titers? in Method section, authors declared that viral titers was detected at 7-14 days post microinjection. Please demonstrate the days exactly.
The last problem is that how author made sure that the viral titers in salivary glands of insects between two experiments was equal, causing different phenotype of rice plant. If not, different viral titers in salivary glands of insects between two experiments of course caused different phenotype of rice plant.
3. The callose deposition in phloem can be induced by insect feeding. In Fig. 5H, why was the callose deposition increased in the whole vascular bundle, but not phloem? Could the transgenic rice plant directional express protein in the phloem? In Fig.5, why was callose deposition detected at 24 h after insect feeding? In Fig. 6A, why was callose deposition decreased in the phloem, but not all the cells of the of TLP OE plant? Also in Fig.6A and B, expression of callose synthase genes was required.
-
Reviewer #2 (Public Review):
There is increasing evidence that viruses manipulate vectors and hosts to facilitate transmission. For arthropods, saliva plays an essential role for successful feeding on a host and consequently for arthropod-borne viruses that are transmitted during arthropod feeding on new hosts. This is so because saliva constitutes the interaction interface between arthropod and host and contains many enzymes and effectors that allow feeding on a compatible host by neutralizing host defenses. Therefore, it is not surprising that viruses change saliva composition or use saliva proteins to provoke altered vector-host interactions that are favorable for virus transmission. However, detailed mechanistic analyses are scarce. Here, Zhao and coworkers study transmission of rice stripe virus (RSV) by the planthopper Laodelphax …
Reviewer #2 (Public Review):
There is increasing evidence that viruses manipulate vectors and hosts to facilitate transmission. For arthropods, saliva plays an essential role for successful feeding on a host and consequently for arthropod-borne viruses that are transmitted during arthropod feeding on new hosts. This is so because saliva constitutes the interaction interface between arthropod and host and contains many enzymes and effectors that allow feeding on a compatible host by neutralizing host defenses. Therefore, it is not surprising that viruses change saliva composition or use saliva proteins to provoke altered vector-host interactions that are favorable for virus transmission. However, detailed mechanistic analyses are scarce. Here, Zhao and coworkers study transmission of rice stripe virus (RSV) by the planthopper Laodelphax striatellus. RSV infects plants as well as the vector, accumulates in salivary glands and is injected together with saliva into a new host during vector feeding.
The authors present evidence that a saliva-contained enzyme - carbonic anhydrase (CA) - might facilitate virus infection of rice by interfering with callose deposition, a plant defense response. In vitro pull-down experiments, yeast two hybrid assay and binding affinity assays show convincingly interaction between CA and a plant thaumatin-like protein (TLP) that degrades callose. Similar experiments show that CA and TLP interact with the RSV nuclear capsid protein NT to form a complex. Formation of the CA-TLP complex increases TLP activity by roughly 30% and integration of NT increases TLP activity further. This correlates with lower callose content in RSV-infected plants and higher virus titer. Further, silencing CA in vectors decreases virus titers in infected plants. Interestingly, aphid CA was found to play a role in plant infection with two non-persistent non-circulative viruses, turnip mosaic virus and cucumber mosaic virus (Guo et al. 2023 doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2222040120), but the proposed mode of action is entirely different.
While this is an interesting work, there are, in my opinion, some weak points. The microinjection experiments result in much lower virus accumulation in rice than infection by vector inoculation, so their interpretation is difficult. Also, the effect of injected recombinant CA protein might fade over time because of degradation or dilution. The authors claim that enzymatic activity of CA is not required for its proviral activity. However, this is difficult to assess because all CA mutants used for the corresponding experiments possess residual activity. It remains also unclear whether viral infection deregulates CA expression in planthoppers and TLP expression in plants. However, increased CA and TLP levels could alone contribute to reduced callose deposition.
-
