Universal Health Coverage and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Bangladesh Perspective

  1. Most. Zannatul Ferdous
  2. Ummay Soumayia Islam

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Like many other countries around the world, Bangladesh adopts Universal Health Coverage (UHC) as a national aspiration. The central theme of its providing quality and affordable health services which is a significant element of social protection. This paper was aimed to provide a narrative understanding of the perspectives of UHC in Bangladesh towards COVID-19 based on the existing literature.

Methods

We conducted a review combining articles and abstracts with full HTML and PDF format. We searched Google Scholar, ScienceDirect and Google using multiple terms related to UHC, COVID-19 and Bangladesh without any date boundary and without any basis of types of studies, that is, all types of studies were scrutinized.

Results

This short description highlights that the current pandemic COVID-19 holds lessons that health systems and economies in several countries like Bangladesh are not in enough preparation to tackle a massive public health crisis. It reports the shortage of health workers, scarcity of personal protective equipment, limited and ineffective diagnostic facilities, inadequate infrastructure of health care facilities, scarcity of drugs, and underfunded health services. Further, COVID-19 pandemic highlights the country’s health system needs an ongoing rehab post-COVID-19 with strong coordination in governance, in health economics, in health systems, in information systems, as well as in community participation in health to achieve UHC.

Conclusions

Addressing the needs for UHC achievement, it is important to break down the access barriers and keeping up to date all the activities addressing public health crisis like COVID-19.

Article activity feed

  1. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2020.11.11.20229526: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2020.11.11.20229526v1 on medRxiv