How the COVID-19 pandemic and cost-of-living crisis shaped reach and engagement in the ECAIL trial targeting socially disadvantaged families: an interdisciplinary implementation study
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
The ECAIL trial, launched in 2017, targets hard-to-reach families and evaluates a multicomponent childhood obesity prevention intervention. At a maternity hospital in Lille, France, healthcare providers screened pregnant women experiencing social vulnerability, and dietitians delivered a home-based intervention until age 2. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a six-month suspension in 2020. This study compared eligibility and participation before the pandemic and after resumption, and examined how the pandemic and subsequent cost-of-living crisis shaped implementation and reach.
Methods
We analyzed 5,744 eligibility questionnaires distributed at the maternity ward. Inclusion criteria included ≥1 indicator of social vulnerability (e.g., socioeconomic disadvantage, precarious housing, or social isolation). To capture implementation experiences, a psychosocial researcher conducted a focus group with six dietitians delivering the intervention; it was recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically focusing on reach, acceptability, and adaptation.
Results
Eligibility increased from 29.7% (n=955) prepandemic to 33.6% (n=849) after resumption, while the distribution of vulnerability criteria remained similar across periods: 78.3% received social/medical benefits; employment was not the main source of household income for 58.7%; 24.4% experienced financial hardship; 14.7% reported social isolation; 6.0% lived in precarious housing; and 19.0% had three or more vulnerabilities. Participation among eligible women remained stable (24.6%; n=443). Qualitative findings indicated dietitians’ satisfaction and participants’ enthusiasm for the resumption of home visits, particularly in addressing social isolation. After resumption, the introduction of a pre-visit COVID-19 questionnaire reduced missed appointments. Converging qualitative and quantitative findings indicated sustained, and in some cases strengthened, provider engagement despite pandemic-related strain on hospital services.
Conclusions
This study shows that a complex intervention can maintain reach and acceptability through adaptive implementation under major contextual disruptions. The rapid resumption of home-based services emerged as a robust strategy for engaging and retaining socially disadvantaged families, highlighting the importance of flexible, context-sensitive approaches during social and economic crises.
Trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03003117 ; registration date: 21/12/2016; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03003117
