Integrating genomic resources to present full gene and putative promoter capture probe sets for bread wheat

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. Now published in GigaScience doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz018

    Laura-jayne Gardiner 1Earlham Institute, Norwich, UKFind this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteThomas Brabbs 1Earlham Institute, Norwich, UKFind this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteAlina Akhunova 2Kansas State University, Department of Plant Pathology, Manhattan, KS, USAFind this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteHikmet Budak 3Montana State University, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Bozeman, MT, USAFind this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteTodd Richmond 4Roche Sequencing Solutions, Seattle, WA, USAFind this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteSukwinder Singh 5CIMMYT, Obregon, MexicoFind this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteLeah Catchpole 1Earlham Institute, Norwich, UKFind this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteEduard Akhunov 2Kansas State University, Department of Plant Pathology, Manhattan, KS, USAFind this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this siteAnthony Hall 1Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK6School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKFind this author on Google ScholarFind this author on PubMedSearch for this author on this site

    A version of this preprint has been published in the Open Access journal GigaScience (see paper https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz018 ), where the paper and peer reviews are published openly under a CC-BY 4.0 license.

    These peer reviews were as follows:

    Reviewer 1: http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/REVIEW.101535 Reviewer 2: http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/REVIEW.101536