Usefulness of real-time RT-PCR to understand the kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 in blood: A prospective study

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.03.07.22271764: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: All patients gave their informed consent, and the research protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board (register number 4267).
    IRB: All patients gave their informed consent, and the research protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board (register number 4267).
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    The present study has certain limitations. First, the number of patients included in the study was moderate (57 patients). Second, although two RT-PCR techniques were performed, only the TapPath™ test allowed us to quantify the viral load (in copies/ml and log10 viral load). In summary, we conclude that persistent SARS-CoV-2 viremia in blood samples may be potentially used as indicator of poor prognosis in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Both qualitative and quantitative RT-PCR techniques are suitable for the characterisation of viremia kinetics in plasma and serum samples. Knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 kinetics in blood allows stratification of hospitalised COVID-19 patients.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No funding statement was detected.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.