Designing and making an in-house real-time RT qPCR kit for the detection of SARS-CoV- 2 infection at high sensitivity and low cost

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background The widespread use of accurate real-time RT-PCR tests for community individuals is a critical approach to managing the disease and reducing COVID-19 transmission effectively. In addition, serological ELISA assays are another essential tool for detecting and/or quantifying SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies or for screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Objectives The objective of the current study is to develop an in-house multiplex real-time RT-qPCR kit for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 N and E genes . Materials and methods A total of 100 samples from the Central Public Health Laboratory were analyzed: 50 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA and 50 tested negative. Results The in-house multiplex qPCR assay showed a significant association at P value 0.01 between the in-house N gene CT Value and the commercial N gene CT value, but there was no significant association at P value 0.09 between the in-house E gene CT Value and the commercial E gene CT Value. The in-house-designed RT-qPCR-E gene had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 98.11%. The in-house-designed RT-qPCR N gene had a sensitivity of 92.31% and a specificity of 98.11%. Overall, or combined, sensitivity and specificity of the in-house-designed RT qPCR assay were 96.08% and 100.00%, respectively. Conclusions The in-house-designed multiplex real-time RT-qPCR kit was more sensitive than the commercial kit for detecting SARS-CoV-2, and the in-house ELISA kit showed acceptable sensitivity and specificity, given its very low cost. The in-house designed kits were far less expensive than the commercial kits. This study demonstrated a broad range of viral loads, which means some infected individuals with low viral loads might be below the limit of detection of commercial assays.

Article activity feed