Design and Multicenter Clinical Validation of a 3-Dimensionally Printed Nasopharyngeal Swab for SARS-CoV-2 Testing

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.18.20134791: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementConsent: All participants were recruited with informed consent, and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Healthcare Group, Singapore (Approval number: DSRB 2020/00464).
    IRB: All participants were recruited with informed consent, and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Healthcare Group, Singapore (Approval number: DSRB 2020/00464).
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power AnalysisPower calculations were performed using the R package: Basic Functions for Power Analysis (pwr), v1.3-0.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    All participants were recruited with informed consent, and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Healthcare Group, Singapore (Approval number: DSRB 2020/00464).
    National Healthcare
    suggested: None
    All parts of the study were performed in compliance with the Human Biomedical Research Act, Singapore.
    Human Biomedical
    suggested: None
    Participants assigned an even case number received the FLOQSwab first, followed by the Python swab, while the reverse was true for participants assigned with an odd case number.
    Python
    suggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)
    Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis for the mechanical testing and fluid experiments were performed in GraphPad Prism version 8.4.2 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA).
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We found bar graphs of continuous data. We recommend replacing bar graphs with more informative graphics, as many different datasets can lead to the same bar graph. The actual data may suggest different conclusions from the summary statistics. For more information, please see Weissgerber et al (2015).


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.