AI

Assessing ChatGPT’s Mastery of Bloom’s Taxonomy using psychosomatic medicine exam questions

1. Anne Herrmann-Werner
2. Teresa Festl-Wietek
3. Friederike Holderried
4. Lea Herschbach
5. Jan Griewatz
6. Ken Masters
7. Stephan Zipfel
8. Moritz Mahling

Utilizing ChatGPT to select literature for meta-analysis shows workload reduction while maintaining a similar recall level as manual curation

1. Xiangming Cai
2. Yuanming Geng
3. Yiming Du
4. Bart Westerman
5. Duolao Wang
6. Chiyuan Ma
7. Juan J. Garcia Vallejo

Reply to Dages, et al. You AIn’t using it right: Artificial intelligence progress in allergy

1. Dylan Lawless

Harnessing the Open Access Version of ChatGPT for Enhanced Clinical Opinions

1. Zachary M Tenner
2. Michael Cottone
3. Martin Chavez

From Answers to Insights: Unveiling the Strengths and Limitations of ChatGPT and Biomedical Knowledge Graphs

1. Yu Hou
2. Jeremy Yeung
3. Hua Xu
4. Chang Su
5. Fei Wang
6. Rui Zhang

Attitudes and Perceptions of Medical Researchers Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scientific Process: A Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Survey

1. Jeremy Y. Ng
2. Sharleen G. Maduranayagam
3. Cynthia Lokker
4. Alfonso Iorio
5. R. Brian Haynes
6. David Moher

Artificial Intelligence in Biomedicine: Systematic Review

1. Irene S. Gabashvili

A publishing infrastructure for AI-assisted academic authoring

1. Milton Pividori
2. Casey S. Greene

Too bad to be fraud, Midjourney has yet to embark in science

1. Michael Cammer

ChatGPT identifies gender disparities in scientific peer review

1. Jeroen P. H. Verharen

• Curated by eLife

  eLife assessment

  This study used ChatGPT to assess certain linguistic characteristics (sentiment and politeness) of 500 peer reviews for 200 neuroscience papers published in Nature Communications. The vast majority of reviews were polite, but papers with female first authors received less polite reviews than papers with male first authors, whereas papers with a female senior author received more favourable reviews than papers with a male senior author. Overall, the study is an important contribution to work on gender bias, but the evidence that generative AI programs like ChatGPT have the potential to be useful in meta-research is incomplete, especially given the lack of a comparison to the many existing and already-validated tools for sentiment analysis based on natural language processing.

Reviewed by eLife

ChatGPT applications in Academic Research: A Review of Benefits, Concerns, and Recommendations

1. Adhari AlZaabi
2. Amira ALAmri
3. Halima Albalushi
4. Ruqaya Aljabri
5. AbdulRahman AalAbdulsalam